Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23353575›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2013

A high-throughput screen to identify enhancers of ADAR-mediated RNA-editing.

Wojciech Garncarz, Aamira Tariq, Cornelia Handl, Oliver Pusch, Michael F Jantsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. ncRNA Editing: Functional Characterization and Computational Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Explaining Pathogenicity of Congenital Zika and Guillain-Barré Syndromes: Does Dysregulation of RNA Editing Play a Role?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wojciech GarncarzDepartment of Chromosome Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aamira Tariq
Cornelia Handl
Oliver Pusch
Michael F Jantsch
Max Perutz Labs · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine to inosine deamination of RNA is widespread in metazoa. Inosines are recognized as guanosines and, therefore, this RNA-editing can influence the coding potential, localization and stability of RNAs. Therefore, RNA editing contributes to the diversification of the transcriptome in a flexible manner. The editing reaction is performed by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs), which are essential for normal life and development in many organisms. Changes in editing levels are observed during development but also in neurological pathologies like schizophrenia, depression or tumors. Frequently, changes in editing levels are not reflected by changes in ADAR levels suggesting a regulation of enzyme activity. Until now, only a few factors are known that influence the activity of ADARs. Here we present a two-stage in vivo editing screen aimed to isolate enhancers of editing. A primary, high-throughput yeast-screen is combined with a more accurate secondary screen in mammalian cells that uses a fluorescent read-out to detect minor differences in RNA-editing. The screen was successfully employed to identify DSS1/SHFM1, the RNA binding protein hnRNP A2/B1 and a 3' UTR as enhancers of editing. By varying intracellular DSS1/SHFM1 levels, we can modulate A to I editing by up to 30%. Proteomic analysis indicates an interaction of DSS1/SHFM1 and hnRNP A2/B1 suggesting that both factors may act by altering the cellular RNP landscape. An extension of this screen to cDNAs from different tissues or developmental stages may prove useful for the identification of additional enhancers of RNA-editing.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticRNA Editing3' Untranslated RegionsAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsDNA, ComplementaryGenetic VectorsHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHeterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group A-BHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRatsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger3' Untranslated RegionsADARB1 protein, humanAdenosine DeaminaseDNA, ComplementaryHeterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group A-BProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSEM1 protein, humanDSS1regulation of RNA-editingRNA-bindingRNA-editingTREX-2yeast screen

Identifiers

PMID23353575
PMCPMC3594278
OpenAlexW2062367832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.