Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23353096›Full record

ArticleBiomedical materials (Bristol, England)2013

Fabrication and characterization of multiscale electrospun scaffolds for cartilage regeneration.

Erica J Levorson, Perumcherry Raman Sreerekha, Krishna Prasad Chennazhi, F Kurtis Kasper, Shantikumar V Nair, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical materials (Bristol, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent advances in bionic scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Electrospun Polymers in Cartilage Engineering-State of Play.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erica J LevorsonDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, MS-142, PO Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA.
Perumcherry Raman Sreerekha
Krishna Prasad Chennazhi
F Kurtis Kasper
Shantikumar V Nair
Antonios G Mikos

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32GM008362 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI WEST, JENNIFER L · 1990 to 2010
$3.6M
Flow Perfusion Bioreactor Fabrication of Bioactive Polymer/ECM Hybrid ConstructsR01AR057083 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057083NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR57083NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008362NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, scaffolds for tissue regeneration purposes have been observed to utilize nanoscale features in an effort to reap the cellular benefits of scaffold features resembling extracellular matrix (ECM) components. However, one complication surrounding electrospun nanofibers is limited cellular infiltration. One method to ameliorate this negative effect is by incorporating nanofibers into microfibrous scaffolds. This study shows that it is feasible to fabricate electrospun scaffolds containing two differently scaled fibers interspersed evenly throughout the entire construct as well as scaffolds containing fibers composed of two discrete materials, specifically fibrin and poly(ε-caprolactone). In order to accomplish this, multiscale fibrous scaffolds of different compositions were generated using a dual extrusion electrospinning setup with a rotating mandrel. These scaffolds were then characterized for fiber diameter, porosity and pore size and seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells to assess the influence of scaffold architecture and composition on cellular responses as determined by cellularity, histology and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content. Analysis revealed that nanofibers within a microfiber mesh function to maintain scaffold cellularity under serum-free conditions as well as aid the deposition of GAGs. This supports the hypothesis that scaffolds with constituents more closely resembling native ECM components may be beneficial for cartilage regeneration.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsCartilageCell AdhesionCell MovementCell SurvivalFibrinGlycosaminoglycansHumansMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNanofibersNanotechnologyPolyestersPorosityRegenerationBiocompatible MaterialsFibrinGlycosaminoglycanspolycaprolactonePolyesters

Identifiers

PMID23353096
PMCPMC3857106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.