Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23351090›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of anti-epileptic drugs for refractory focal epilepsy: systematic review and network meta-analysis reveals the need for long term comparator trials.

Pritesh N Bodalia, Anthony M Grosso, Reecha Sofat, Raymond J Macallister, Liam Smeeth, Soraya Dhillon, Juan-Pablo Casas, David Wonderling, Aroon D Hingorani

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Gabapentin add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Gabapentin add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Topiramate for smoking cessation: a randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: a network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Epilepsy and brain tumors.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2016
    Review
  20. What is New in the Management of Epilepsy in Gliomas?Current treatment options in neurology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pritesh N BodaliaGenetic Epidemiology Group, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Division of Population Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Pharmacy, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK.
Anthony M Grosso
Reecha Sofat
Raymond J Macallister
Liam Smeeth
Soraya Dhillon
Juan-Pablo Casas
David Wonderling
Aroon D Hingorani
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBrunel University of London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/09/022/26739Wellcome Trust 098504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the comparative efficacy (50% reduction in seizure frequency) and tolerability (premature withdrawal due to adverse events) of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for refractory epilepsy.

methodsWe searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library 2009, issue 2) including Epilepsy Group's specialized register, MEDLINE (1950 to March 2009), EMBASE (1980 to March 2009), and Current Contents Connect (1998 to March 2009) to conduct a systematic review of published studies, developed a treatment network and undertook a network meta-analysis.

resultsForty-three eligible trials with 6346 patients and 12 interventions, including placebo, contributed to the analysis. Only three direct drug comparator trials were identified, the remaining 40 trials being placebo-controlled. Conventional random-effects meta-analysis indicated all drugs were superior in efficacy to placebo (overall odds ratio (OR] 3.78, 95% CI 3.14, 4.55) but did not permit firm distinction between drugs on the basis of the efficacy or tolerability. A Bayesian network meta-analysis prioritized oxcarbazepine, topiramate and pregabalin on the basis of short term efficacy. However, sodium valproate, levetiracetam, gabapentin and vigabatrin were prioritized on the basis of short-term efficacy and tolerability, with the caveat that vigabatrin is recognized as being associated with serious visual disturbance with chronic use.

conclusionOf the wide range of AEDs licensed for the treatment of refractory epilepsy, sodium valproate, levetiracetam and gabapentin demonstrated the best balance of efficacy and tolerability. Until regulators mandate greater use of active comparator trials with longer term follow-up, network meta-analysis provides the only available means to quantify these clinically important parameters.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnticonvulsantsBayes TheoremClinical Trials as TopicEpilepsies, PartialHumansTime FactorsAnticonvulsantsanticonvulsants/therapeutic usecomparative studyepilepsy/drug therapymeta-analysisreviewtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID23351090
PMCPMC3853525
OpenAlexW1571442295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.