Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23349806›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Rapid two-temperature formalin fixation.

David Chafin, Abbey Theiss, Esteban Roberts, Grace Borlee, Michael Otter, Geoffrey S Baird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AnViruses · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of formalin fixation on mismatch repair protein evaluation by immunohistochemistry.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Formalin Fixation for Tissue Biopsies Using Shear Wave Laser Speckle Imaging System.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David ChafinVentana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Abbey Theiss
Esteban Roberts
Grace Borlee
Michael Otter
Geoffrey S Baird

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formalin fixation is a mainstay of modern histopathologic analysis, yet the practice is poorly standardized and a significant potential source of preanalytical errors. Concerns of workflow and turnaround time drive interest in developing shorter fixation protocols, but rapid protocols can lead to poor histomorphology or inadequate downstream assay results. Additionally, assays such as immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated epitopes have historically been challenging in the context of formalin-fixed tissue, indicating that there may be room for improvement in this process that is fundamental to the practice of anatomic pathology. With these issues in mind, we studied basic formalin biochemistry to develop a novel formalin fixation protocol that involves a pre-incubation in subambient temperature formalin prior to a brief exposure to heated formalin. This new protocol is more rapid than standard protocols yet preserves histomorphology and yields tissue that is compatible with an expanded set of downstream clinical and research assays, including immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated epitopes.

Indexed as

FormaldehydeTemperatureFixativesHumansImmunohistochemistryPalatine TonsilProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Reproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsTissue FixationFixativesFormaldehydeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2

Identifiers

PMID23349806
PMCPMC3548901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.