Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23349252›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2013

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of breast cancer by hormone receptor status.

Seungyoun Jung, Donna Spiegelman, Laura Baglietto, Leslie Bernstein, Deborah A Boggs, Piet A van den Brandt, Julie E Buring, James R Cerhan, Mia M Gaudet, Graham G Giles and 30 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Seungyoun JungChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. pojun@channing.harvard.edu
Donna Spiegelman
Laura Baglietto
Leslie Bernstein
Deborah A Boggs
Piet A van den Brandt
Julie E Buring
James R Cerhan
Mia M Gaudet
Graham G Giles
Gary Goodman
Niclas Hakansson
Susan E Hankinson
Kathy Helzlsouer
Pamela L Horn-Ross
Manami Inoue
Vittorio Krogh
Marie Lof
Marjorie L McCullough
Anthony B Miller
Marian L Neuhouser
Julie R Palmer
Yikyung Park
Kim Robien
Thomas E Rohan
Stephanie Scarmo
Catherine Schairer
Leo J Schouten
James M Shikany
Sabina Sieri
Schoichiro Tsugane
Kala Visvanathan
Elisabete Weiderpass
Walter C Willett
Alicja Wolk
Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Shumin M Zhang
Xuehong Zhang
Regina G Ziegler
Stephanie A Smith-Warner
Harvard University Press · USNational Institutes of Health · USAmerican Cancer Society · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNJohns Hopkins University · USMaastricht University · NLNational Cancer Research Institute · GBNew York University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCancer Council Victoria · AUCancer Prevention Institute of California · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USKarolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SEMayo Clinic · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Validity of Diet and Activity Measures in WomenP01CA055075 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 1991 to 2009
$41.8M
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS STUDYR01CA077398 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BERNSTEIN, LESLIE · 1998 to 2014
$29.7M
Women's Health Study: Continued Follow-upR01CA047988 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E., LEE, I-MIN · 1991 to 2014
$28.2M
Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer in the AARP CohortZIACP010196 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SINHA, RASHMI · 2009 to 2025
$21.0M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER IN A COHORT OF OLDER WOMENR01CA039742 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LAZOVICH, DEANN · 1985 to 2014
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA55075NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055075NCI NIH HHS R01 CA039742NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047988NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstrogen receptor-negative (ER(-)) breast cancer has few known or modifiable risk factors. Because ER(-) tumors account for only 15% to 20% of breast cancers, large pooled analyses are necessary to evaluate precisely the suspected inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and risk of ER(-) breast cancer.

methodsAmong 993 466 women followed for 11 to 20 years in 20 cohort studies, we documented 19 869 estrogen receptor positive (ER(+)) and 4821 ER(-) breast cancers. We calculated study-specific multivariable relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses and then combined them using a random-effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsTotal fruit and vegetable intake was statistically significantly inversely associated with risk of ER(-) breast cancer but not with risk of breast cancer overall or of ER(+) tumors. The inverse association for ER(-) tumors was observed primarily for vegetable consumption. The pooled relative risks comparing the highest vs lowest quintile of total vegetable consumption were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.74 to 0.90) for ER(-) breast cancer and 1.04 (95% CI = 0.97 to 1.11) for ER(+) breast cancer (P (common-effects) by ER status < .001). Total fruit consumption was non-statistically significantly associated with risk of ER(-) breast cancer (pooled multivariable RR comparing the highest vs lowest quintile = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.04).

conclusionsWe observed no association between total fruit and vegetable intake and risk of overall breast cancer. However, vegetable consumption was inversely associated with risk of ER(-) breast cancer in our large pooled analyses.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorFruitVegetablesAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRiskBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID23349252
PMCPMC3593764
OpenAlexW2108138991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.