Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23348415›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2013

Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology.

Pierre Vantourout, Adrian Hayday

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 748 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
748citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

748 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell RNA profiling suggests goflikicept-mediated immune modulation in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Transcriptomic Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Viscoelastic Niches Shape γδ T-Cell Phenotype and Effector Function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

688 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierre VantouroutLondon Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, London WC2A 3LY, UK.
Adrian Hayday

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19309Wellcome Trust 085780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

γδ T cells are a unique and conserved population of lymphocytes that have been the subject of a recent explosion of interest owing to their essential contributions to many types of immune response and immunopathology. But what does the integration of recent and long-established studies really tell us about these cells and their place in immunology? The time is ripe to consider the evidence for their unique and crucial functions. We conclude that whereas B cells and αβ T cells are commonly thought to contribute primarily to the antigen-specific effector and memory phases of immunity, γδ T cells are distinct in that they combine conventional adaptive features (inherent in their T cell receptors and pleiotropic effector functions) with rapid, innate-like responses that can place them in the initiation phase of immune reactions. This underpins a revised perspective on lymphocyte biology and the regulation of immunogenicity.

Indexed as

ImmunityAnimalsAntigensHumansLymphocyte ActivationProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-LymphocytesAntigensReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID23348415
PMCPMC3951794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.