ArticleNature reviews. Immunology2013
Innate-like lymphocytes: Will the real ILC1 please stand up?
Article in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eomes Expression Defines Group 1 Innate Lymphoid Cells During Metastasis in Human and Mouse.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- The role of respiratory epithelium in host defence against influenza virus infection.Biomedical journal · 2018Review
- Effects of HIV infection and ART on phenotype and function of circulating monocytes, natural killer, and innate lymphoid cells.AIDS research and therapy · 2018Review
- Innate lymphoid cells in the defense against infections.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
23348410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.