Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23347836›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2013

Non-invasive characterization of polyurethane-based tissue constructs in a rat abdominal repair model using high frequency ultrasound elasticity imaging.

Jiao Yu, Keisuke Takanari, Yi Hong, Kee-Won Lee, Nicholas J Amoroso, Yadong Wang, William R Wagner, Kang Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Imaging Biomaterial-Tissue Interactions.Trends in biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Imaging strategies for tissue engineering applications.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiao YuCenter for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC, Heart and Vascular Institute, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Keisuke Takanari
Yi Hong
Kee-Won Lee
Nicholas J Amoroso
Yadong Wang
William R Wagner
Kang Kim

Funding

High-resolution ultrasound in-vivo animal imaging system-Vevo2100S10RR027383 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIM, KANG · 2010 to 2010
$498k
Noninvasive Monitoring of Tissue-engineered Constructs by US Elasticity ImagingR21EB013353 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIM, KANG · 2011 to 2012
$417k
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR027383NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027383NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB013353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of candidate materials and designs for soft tissue scaffolds would benefit from the ability to monitor the mechanical remodeling of the implant site without the need for periodic animal sacrifice and explant analysis. Toward this end, the ability of non-invasive ultrasound elasticity imaging (UEI) to assess temporal mechanical property changes in three different types of porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds was evaluated in a rat abdominal wall repair model. The polymers utilized were salt-leached scaffolds of poly(carbonate urethane) urea, poly(ester urethane) urea and poly(ether ester urethane) urea at 85% porosity. A total of 60 scaffolds (20 each type) were implanted in a full thickness muscle wall replacement in the abdomens of 30 rats. The constructs were ultrasonically scanned every 2 weeks and harvested at weeks 4, 8 and 12 for compression testing or histological analysis. UEI demonstrated different temporal stiffness trends among the different scaffold types, while the stiffness of the surrounding native tissue remained unchanged. The changes in average normalized strains developed in the constructs from UEI compared well with the changes of mean compliance from compression tests and histology. The average normalized strains and the compliance for the same sample exhibited a strong linear relationship. The ability of UEI to identify herniation and to characterize the distribution of local tissue in-growth with high resolution was also investigated. In summary, the reported data indicate that UEI may allow tissue engineers to sequentially evaluate the progress of tissue construct mechanical behavior in vivo and in some cases may reduce the need for interim time point animal sacrifice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenElasticityFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, AnimalPolyestersPolyurethanesPorosityRatsRats, Inbred LewTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsUltrasonicsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenpoly(carbonate urea) urethanePolyesterspoly(ester urethane)ureapoly(ether ester urethane)ureaPolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID23347836
PMCPMC3565386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.