ArticleBiomaterials2013
Non-invasive characterization of polyurethane-based tissue constructs in a rat abdominal repair model using high frequency ultrasound elasticity imaging.
Article in Biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Quantitative Method for the Evaluation of Deep Vein Thrombosis in a Murine Model Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Design Considerations to Facilitate Clinical Radiological Evaluation of Implantable Biomedical Structures.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- Medical imaging of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine constructs.Biomaterials science · 2021Review
- Radiopaque scaffolds based on electrospun iodixanol/polycaprolactone fibrous composites.Materialia · 2020Article
- Photoacoustic Imaging in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2020Review
- Biopolymeric In Situ Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering and Bioimaging Applications.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2018Review
- Imaging Biomaterial-Tissue Interactions.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
- Validation of Ultrasound Elastography Imaging for Nondestructive Characterization of Stiffer Biomaterials.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Article
- Non-invasive and Non-destructive Characterization of Tissue Engineered Constructs Using Ultrasound Imaging Technologies: A Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Review
- Quantitative Ultrasound for Nondestructive Characterization of Engineered Tissues and Biomaterials.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Review
- Application of Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Biomechanics in Engineered Biomaterials and Tissues.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2016Review
- Noninvasive Quantitative Imaging of Collagen Microstructure in Three-Dimensional Hydrogels Using High-Frequency Ultrasound.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2015Article
- Naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle reconstruction.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2015Review
- Imaging strategies for tissue engineering applications.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2015Review
- Biomedical Imaging in Implantable Drug Delivery Systems.Current drug targets · 2015Review
- In vivo monitoring of structural and mechanical changes of tissue scaffolds by multi-modality imaging.Biomaterials · 2014Article
- Application of ultrasound on monitoring the evolution of the collagen fiber reinforced nHAC/CS composites in vivo.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Imaging challenges in biomaterials and tissue engineering.Biomaterials · 2013Article
- Engineered cell-laden human protein-based elastomer.Biomaterials · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evaluation of candidate materials and designs for soft tissue scaffolds would benefit from the ability to monitor the mechanical remodeling of the implant site without the need for periodic animal sacrifice and explant analysis. Toward this end, the ability of non-invasive ultrasound elasticity imaging (UEI) to assess temporal mechanical property changes in three different types of porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds was evaluated in a rat abdominal wall repair model. The polymers utilized were salt-leached scaffolds of poly(carbonate urethane) urea, poly(ester urethane) urea and poly(ether ester urethane) urea at 85% porosity. A total of 60 scaffolds (20 each type) were implanted in a full thickness muscle wall replacement in the abdomens of 30 rats. The constructs were ultrasonically scanned every 2 weeks and harvested at weeks 4, 8 and 12 for compression testing or histological analysis. UEI demonstrated different temporal stiffness trends among the different scaffold types, while the stiffness of the surrounding native tissue remained unchanged. The changes in average normalized strains developed in the constructs from UEI compared well with the changes of mean compliance from compression tests and histology. The average normalized strains and the compliance for the same sample exhibited a strong linear relationship. The ability of UEI to identify herniation and to characterize the distribution of local tissue in-growth with high resolution was also investigated. In summary, the reported data indicate that UEI may allow tissue engineers to sequentially evaluate the progress of tissue construct mechanical behavior in vivo and in some cases may reduce the need for interim time point animal sacrifice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.