Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23347224›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2013

Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis.

Teresa L Hagan, Heidi S Donovan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The relationship between self-efficacy and self-advocacy among young and middle-aged Chinese breast cancer patients: the mediating effect of health literacy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Post-traumatic growth related to long-term follow up in survivors of childhood cancer: a national qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Listening to patients: A qualitative study on diagnostic delay, coping strategies and stigma in early-onset colorectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa L HaganDepartment of Acute and Tertiary Care, The University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, PA, USA.
Heidi S Donovan

Funding

Web-Based Ovarian Cancer Symptom Control: Nurse-Guided vs. Self-DirectedR01NR010735 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONOVAN, HEIDI S · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Interdisciplinary Training of Nurse Scientists in Cancer Survivorship ResearchT32NR011972 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BENDER, CATHERINE M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR010735NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010735NINR NIH HHS T32 NR011972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo report an analysis of the concept of self-advocacy among individuals with cancer to clarify its meaning, to differentiate this meaning with related concepts, and to unify understanding of the concept in cancer research and practice.

backgroundCancer survivors are increasingly required to assume an active role in their health care. A thorough analysis of how survivors advocate for themselves is a crucial aspect in supporting survivors' ability to engage and manage their care throughout all stages of cancer survivorship.

designWalker and Avant's eight-step process of conducting a concept analysis was used. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles, reviews, editorials, and grey literature directly addressing self-advocacy. REVIEW

methodsA broad inquiry into the literature from 1960 to 2012 that produces a definition of self-advocacy. Model and contrary cases of self-advocacy demonstrate the concept's application and intricacies.

resultsAntecedents to self-advocacy include particular personal characteristics, learned skills, and attainable support. The essential element of self-advocacy and what differentiates it from related concepts, is the internalization of these antecedent resources into self-advocacy thoughts and actions while incorporating personal values and priorities in a way that upholds the survivors' goals and beliefs. A full realization of self-advocacy facilitates a cancer survivor attaining a strong self-concept, sense of control, and adaptation to a life with cancer.

conclusionsSelf-advocacy is a process of internalizing skills and resources to act in a way that supports survivors' needs and goals.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyGoalsHumansNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsSocial SupportSurvivorsadvocacycancer survivorshipconcept analysisnursingself-advocacy

Identifiers

PMID23347224
PMCPMC3640735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.