Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23346527›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2012

Comparison of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: In vitro maturation, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles.

Min Hye Choi, Sun Hee Lee, Hye Ok Kim, Sun Hwa Cha, Jin Young Kim, Kwang Moon Yang, In Ok Song, Mi Kyoung Koong, Inn Soo Kang, Chan Woo Park

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03134482 (Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between in Vitro Maturation and Minimal Stimulation in Vitro Fertilization in Patients With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome; Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Parallel, Open-label, Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03134482 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between in Vitro Maturation and Minimal Stimulation in Vitro Fertilization in Patients With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome; Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Parallel, Open-label, Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHA UniversityRan2017 to 2023Enrolled240ConditionsNo ConditionArmsIVM, Minimal stimulation IVF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A case of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2014
    Article
  13. Polycystic ovary syndrome: current status and future perspective.Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition) · 2014 · on this map
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min Hye ChoiDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun Hee Lee
Hye Ok Kim
Sun Hwa Cha
Jin Young Kim
Kwang Moon Yang
In Ok Song
Mi Kyoung Koong
Inn Soo Kang
Chan Woo Park
Catholic Kwandong University · KRCheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared the assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) treated with IVM, conventional IVF, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles.

methodsThe prospective study included a total of 67 cycles in 61 infertile women with PCOS. The women with PCOS were randomized into three IVF protocols: IVM/IVF with FSH and hCG priming with immature oocyte retrieval 38 hours later (group A, 14 cycles), GnRH agonist long protocol (group B, 14 cycles), and GnRH antagonist multi-dose flexible protocol (group C, 39 cycles). IVF outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate (MR), and live birth rate (LBR), were compared among the three groups.

resultsAge, BMI, and basal FSH and LH levels did not differ among the three groups. The number of retrieved oocytes and 2 pronucleus embryos was significantly lower in group A compared with groups B and C. The CPR, IR, MR, and LBR per embryo transfer showed no differences among the three groups. There was no incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in group A.

conclusionThe IR, MR, and LBR in the IVM cycles were comparable to those of the GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist cycles. The IVM protocol, FSH and hCG priming with oocyte retrieval 38 hours later, is an effective ART option that is comparable with conventional IVF for infertile women with PCOS.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductive technology outcomeGnRH agonistGnRH antagonistIn vitro maturationPolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID23346527
PMCPMC3548075
OpenAlexW2144290090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.