ArticleHealthcare informatics research2012
Human Factors Engineering in HI: So What? Who Cares? and What's in It for You?
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers, Facilitators, and Solutions to Optimal Patient Portal and Personal Health Record Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Pooled it
- Local Investment in Training Drives Electronic Health Record User Satisfaction.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Clinical Data Warehouse Query and Learning Tool Using a Human-Centered Participatory Design Process.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2018Article
- Biomedical Informatics Investigator.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2018Article
- Secondary Use of EHR: Interpreting Clinician Inter-Rater Reliability Through Qualitative Assessment.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2017Article
- Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- Redesigning printed educational materials for primary care physicians: design improvements increase usability.Implementation science : IS · 2015Article
- User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2015Article
- Capsule commentary on Ancker et al., Rapid growth in use of personal health records in New York, 2012-2013.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Article
- Trends in health information technology safety: from technology-induced errors to current approaches for ensuring technology safety.Healthcare informatics research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHuman factors engineering is a discipline that deals with computer and human systems and processes and provides a methodology for designing and evaluating systems as they interact with human beings. This review article reviews important current and past efforts in human factors engineering in health informatics in the context of the current trends in health informatics.
methodsThe methodology of human factors engineering and usability testing in particular were reviewed in this article.
resultsThis methodology arises from the field of human factors engineering, which uses principles from cognitive science and applies them to implementations such as a computer-human interface and user-centered design.
conclusionsPatient safety and best practice of medicine requires a partnership between patients, clinicians and computer systems that serve to improve the quality and safety of patient care. People approach work and problems with their own knowledge base and set of past experiences and their ability to use systems properly and with low error rates are directly related to the usability as well as the utility of computer systems. Unusable systems have been responsible for medical error and patient harm and have even led to the death of patients and increased mortality rates. Electronic Health Record and Computerized Physician Order Entry systems like any medical device should come with a known safety profile that minimizes medical error and harm. This review article reviews important current and past efforts in human factors engineering in health informatics in the context of the current trends in health informatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.