Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23346367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

Microbiotas from UC patients display altered metabolism and reduced ability of LAB to colonize mucus.

Louise Kristine Vigsnaes, Pieter van den Abbeele, Karolina Sulek, Henrik Lauritz Frandsen, Casper Steenholdt, Jørn Brynskov, Joan Vermeiren, Tom van de Wiele, Tine Rask Licht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Regulatory effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Gut Serpinome: Emerging Evidence in IBD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Mucosal healing and deep remission: what does it mean?World journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Louise Kristine VigsnaesNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søborg, Denmark.
Pieter van den Abbeele
Karolina Sulek
Henrik Lauritz Frandsen
Casper Steenholdt
Jørn Brynskov
Joan Vermeiren
Tom van de Wiele
Tine Rask Licht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared fecal microbial communities derived either from Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients in remission (n = 4) or in relapse (n = 4), or from healthy subjects (n = 4). These communities were used for inoculation of a dynamic in vitro gut model, which contained integrated mucin-covered microcosms. We found that the microbiota of the 'mucus' largely differed from that of the 'lumen'. This was partly due to decreased mucus-associated populations of lactic acid producing bacterial populations (LAB), as LAB originating from UC patients had a significantly decreased capacity to colonize the mucin-covered microcosms as compared to those originating from healthy subjects. We found significant differences between the metabolomes of UC patients in relapse and remission, respectively, while the metabolome of patients in remission resembled that of healthy subjects. These novel findings constitute an important contribution to the understanding of the complex etiology of UC.

Indexed as

BacteriaColitis, UlcerativeFecesGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinal MucosaLactic AcidMetabolomeMetagenomeMucinsMucusLactic AcidMucins

Identifiers

PMID23346367
PMCPMC3552269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.