Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23346033›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2012

A short history of the genome-wide association study: where we were and where we are going.

Shiro Ikegawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mathematical bounds on rTheoretical population biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Review of Multi-omics Analyses.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mathematical bounds onbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Human height: a model common complex trait.Annals of human biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Prospects forFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shiro IkegawaLaboratory of Bone and Joint Diseases, Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent rapid advances in genetic research are ushering us into the genome sequence era, where an individual's genome information is utilized for clinical practice. The most spectacular results of the human genome study have been provided by genome-wide association studies (GWASs). This is a review of the history of GWASs as related to my work. Further efforts are necessary to make full use of its potential power to medicine.

Indexed as

genomegenome-wide association studyHapMap ProjectHuman Genome Projectsingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID23346033
PMCPMC3543921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.