Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23345659›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics1997

Vibrations in microtubules.

J Pokorný, F Jelínek, V Trkal, I Lamprecht, R Hölzel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Generation of Electromagnetic Field by Microtubules.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. When Stiffness Matters: Mechanosensing in Heart Development and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Disturbed Coherence: Gate to Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Elastic vibrations in seamless microtubules.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2005
    Article
  18. Viscous damping of vibrations in microtubules.Journal of biological physics · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J PokornýFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic ; Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
F Jelínek
V Trkal
I Lamprecht
R Hölzel
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZFreie Universität Berlin · DECharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrations in microtubules and actin filaments are analysed using amethod similar to that employed for description of lattice vibrationsin solid state physics. The derived dispersion relations show thatvibrations in microtubules can have optical and acoustical branches.The highest frequency of vibrations in microtubules and in actinfilaments is of the order of 10(8) Hz. Vibrations are polar andinteraction with surroundings is mediated by the generatedelectromagnetic field. Supply of energy from hydrolysis of guanosinetriphosphate (GTP) in microtubules and of adenosine triphosphate(ATP) in actin filaments may excite the vibrations.

Indexed as

Dispersion relationEnergy supply to cyto-skeletonFröhlich's condensation in cytoskeletonHydrolysis of ATPHydrolysis of GTPMicrotubule translation symmetryNonlinearity in cytoskeletonVibrations in actin filamentsVibrations in microtubules

Identifiers

PMID23345659
PMCPMC3456394
OpenAlexW1943860763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.