Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23345581›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

Safety and immunogenicity of DNA prime and modified vaccinia ankara virus-HIV subtype C vaccine boost in healthy adults.

Peter Hayes, Jill Gilmour, Andrea von Lieven, Dilbinder Gill, Lorna Clark, Jakub Kopycinski, Hannah Cheeseman, Amy Chung, Galit Alter, Len Dally and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter HayesIAVI Human Immunology Laboratory, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Jill Gilmour
Andrea von Lieven
Dilbinder Gill
Lorna Clark
Jakub Kopycinski
Hannah Cheeseman
Amy Chung
Galit Alter
Len Dally
Devika Zachariah
Angela Lombardo
James Ackland
Eddy Sayeed
Akil Jackson
Marta Boffito
Brian Gazzard
Patricia E Fast
Josephine H Cox
Dagna Laufer
Imperial College London · GBInternational AIDS Vaccine Initiative · USChelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USEmmes (United States) · US

Funding

Demystifying the antiviral activity of the IgG3+ antibody responseR01AI080289 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JUELG, BORIS DOMINIK · 2009 to 2024
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI080289NIAID NIH HHS R01AI080289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I trial was conducted in 32 HIV-uninfected healthy volunteers to assess the safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses of DNA vaccine (Advax) plus 1 dose of recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) (TBC-M4) or 3 doses of TBC-M4 alone (groups A and B, respectively). Both vaccine regimens were found to be safe and well tolerated. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay responses were detected in 1/10 (10%) individuals in group A after three Advax primes and in 9/9 individuals (100%) after the MVA boost. In group B, IFN-γ ELISPOT responses were detected in 6/12 (50%) and 7/11 (64%) individuals after the second and third MVA vaccinations, respectively. Responses to all vaccine components, but predominantly to Env, were seen. The breadth and magnitude of the T cell response and viral inhibition were greater in group A than in group B, indicating that the quality of the T-cell response was enhanced by the DNA prime. Intracellular cytokine staining indicated that the T-cell responses were polyfunctional but were skewed toward Env with a CD4(+) phenotype. At 2 weeks after the last vaccination, HIV-specific antibody responses were detected in all (100%) group B and 1/11 (9.1%) group A vaccinees. Vaccinia virus-specific responses were detected in all (100%) group B and 2/11 (18.2%) group A vaccinees. In conclusion, HIV-specific T-cell responses were seen in the majority of volunteers in groups A and B but with a trend toward greater quality of the T-cell response in group A. Antibody responses were better in group B than in group A.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS VaccinesDrug CarriersEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayHIVHIV AntibodiesHumansInterferon-gammaPlacebosT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccines, DNAVaccines, SyntheticVaccinia virusAIDS VaccinesDrug CarriersHIV AntibodiesInterferon-gammaPlacebosVaccines, DNAVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID23345581
PMCPMC3592345
OpenAlexW2131501849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.