ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2014
Novel mechanisms of action of the biologicals in rheumatic diseases.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Abatacept versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on mortality and medical utilizations in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: a large-scale real-world retrospective cohort study.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Efficacy and retention rate of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients after first-line etanercept failure: the FEARLESS cohort.Rheumatology international · 2020Article
- Review
- Upadacitinib and filgotinib: the role of JAK1 selective inhibition in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Drugs in context · 2019Review
- Collagen V oral administration decreases inflammation and remodeling of synovial membrane in experimental arthritis.PloS one · 2018Article
- The Inflammatory Response in Psoriasis: a Comprehensive Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2016Review
- Emerging Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2016Review
- Treatment of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2016Review
- CD24: from a Hematopoietic Differentiation Antigen to a Genetic Risk Factor for Multiple Autoimmune Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2016Review
- Autoimmunity in 2014.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015Review
- Stem cell therapy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a comprehensive review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014Review
- Autoimmunity in 2013.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014Review
- Unique topics and issues in rheumatology and clinical immunology.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological drugs targeting pro-inflammatory or co-stimulatory molecules or depleting lymphocyte subsets made a revolution in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Their comparable efficacy in clinical trials raised the point of the heterogeneity of RA pathogenesis, suggesting that we are dealing with a syndrome rather than with a single disease. Several tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blockers are available, and a burning question is whether they are biosimilar or not. The evidence of diverse biological effects in vitro is in line with the fact that a lack of efficacy to one TNF-α agent does not imply a non-response to another one. As proteins, biologicals are potentially immunogenic. It has been recently raised that anti-drug antibodies (ADA) may affect their bioavailability and eventually the clinical efficacy through local formation of immune complexes and directly by preventing the interaction between the drug and TNF-α. Regular monitoring of drug and ADA levels appears the best way to tailor anti-TNF-α therapies. Owing to the pleiotropic characteristics of the target, anti-TNF-α blockers may affect several mechanisms beyond rheumatoid synovitis. As TNF-α plays a pivotal role in the induction of early atherosclerosis, treatment with TNF-inhibitors may modulate cholesterol handling, in particular, cholesterol efflux from macrophages. Side effects are a major issue because of the systemic TNF-α blocking action. The efficacy of an anti-C5 monoclonal antibody fused to a peptide targeting inflamed synovia in experimental arthritis opened the way for new strategies: Homing to the synovium of molecules neutralizing TNF would allow to maximize the therapeutic action avoiding the side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.