Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344947›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2013

Stimulus change detection in phasic auditory units in the frog midbrain: frequency and ear specific adaptation.

Abhilash Ponnath, Kim L Hoke, Hamilton E Farris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Schema vs. primitive perceptual grouping: the relative weighting of sequential vs. spatial cues during an auditory grouping task in frogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Article
  6. Direction-Specific Adaptation in Neuronal and Behavioral Responses of an Insect Mechanosensory System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhilash PonnathNeuroscience Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2020 Gravier St., New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Kim L Hoke
Hamilton E Farris
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USColorado State University · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC AND EXTRASYNAPTIC NMDA RECEPTORS AND NEUROPROTECTIVE LIPID SIGNALINGP20RR016816 · NCRR · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI HONG, SONG · 2002 to 2011
$20.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016816NCRR NIH HHS P20RR016816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural adaptation, a reduction in the response to a maintained stimulus, is an important mechanism for detecting stimulus change. Contributing to change detection is the fact that adaptation is often stimulus specific: adaptation to a particular stimulus reduces excitability to a specific subset of stimuli, while the ability to respond to other stimuli is unaffected. Phasic cells (e.g., cells responding to stimulus onset) are good candidates for detecting the most rapid changes in natural auditory scenes, as they exhibit fast and complete adaptation to an initial stimulus presentation. We made recordings of single phasic auditory units in the frog midbrain to determine if adaptation was specific to stimulus frequency and ear of input. In response to an instantaneous frequency step in a tone, 28% of phasic cells exhibited frequency specific adaptation based on a relative frequency change (delta-f=±16%). Frequency specific adaptation was not limited to frequency steps, however, as adaptation was also overcome during continuous frequency modulated stimuli and in response to spectral transients interrupting tones. The results suggest that adaptation is separated for peripheral (e.g., frequency) channels. This was tested directly using dichotic stimuli. In 45% of binaural phasic units, adaptation was ear specific: adaptation to stimulation of one ear did not affect responses to stimulation of the other ear. Thus, adaptation exhibited specificity for stimulus frequency and lateralization at the level of the midbrain. This mechanism could be employed to detect rapid stimulus change within and between sound sources in complex acoustic environments.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionNeuronal PlasticitySignal Detection, PsychologicalAcoustic StimulationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory PathwaysEarMesencephalonPitch PerceptionRana pipiensTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23344947
PMCPMC3700364
OpenAlexW1965101178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.