Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344778›Full record

ArticlePrimary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group2013

Finding the missing millions - the impact of a locally enhanced service for COPD on current and projected rates of diagnosis: a population-based prevalence study using interrupted time series analysis.

Christine Falzon, Michael Soljak, Sarah L Elkin, Iain D Blake, Nicholas S Hopkinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Finding the 'missing millions': do we need incentives to optimise COPD outcomes?Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine FalzonCentral London Community Healthcare, 64 Victoria Street, Westminster, London, UK.
Michael Soljak
Sarah L Elkin
Iain D Blake
Nicholas S Hopkinson
Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are not identified until their condition is relatively advanced and there is a considerable gap between the modelled and diagnosed prevalence of the disease. We have previously shown that, in the first year after the introduction of a locally enhanced service (LES) for COPD in 2008, there was a significant step-up in the diagnosed prevalence.

aimsTo investigate whether this initial increase in prevalence was sustained, and the impact of this increase on future projected rates of COPD diagnosis.

methodsUsing data from 2005-2011, we compared the prevalence of diagnosed COPD in the LES Primary Care Trust (LES-PCT) before and after it was introduced. Data were compared with a neighbouring PCT, the London Strategic Health Authority, and England. The true prevalence of COPD was estimated based on data from the Health Survey for England. Trends were extrapolated to estimate the proportion of patients that would be diagnosed in 2017.

resultsThe introduction of the LES was associated with a significant acceleration in the annual increase in diagnosed COPD (p<0.0001). By 2011 the prevalence was 1.17% in the LES-PCT compared with a predicted value of 0.91% (95% CI 0.86% to 0.95%) based on the pre-LES trend. There was no change in the rate of increase in COPD prevalence for the neighbouring PCT or for London as a whole. The LES-PCT would be expected to diagnose 55.6% of COPD patients by 2017 compared with only 27.3% without the LES, and only 33.3% would be diagnosed in the neighbouring PCT.

conclusionsThese data suggest that, with appropriate incentives, it is possible to achieve a sustained improvement in COPD case-finding in primary care and that such policies need to be implemented systematically.

Indexed as

HumansPrevalencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23344778
PMCPMC6442776
OpenAlexW2028922910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.