Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344732›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2013

Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men: prevalence, phenotypes and screening markers for the Indian population.

S Sen, A R Pasi, R Dada, M B Shamsi, D Modi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repetitive DNA Sequences in the Human Y Chromosome and Male Infertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Male Factors: the Role of Sperm in Preimplantation Embryo Quality.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. External and Genetic Conditions Determining Male Infertility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Consequences of Y chromosome microdeletions beyond male infertility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetics of the human Y chromosome and its association with male infertility.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genetics of Male Infertility.Current urology reports · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S SenMolecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, J.M. Street, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
A R Pasi
R Dada
M B Shamsi
D Modi
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeYq microdeletions are the leading genetic cause of male infertility and its detection is clinically relevant for appropriate genetic counseling. We aimed to determine the prevalence and type of Yq microdeletions, the associated seminal phenotypes and the STS markers that are relevant for its testing in Indian population.

methodsYq microdeletion analysis was carried out in 1,636 infertile cases in our centers. Additional data was collected from published studies in Indian population leading to a total of 3,647 cases.

resultsIn our cohort, 3.4 % (56/1,636) of infertile men had Yq microdeletions. Combining the data from other published studies identified 215/3,647 (5.8 %) infertile individuals to harbor Yq microdeletions; with 6.4 % in azoopsermia, 5.8 % in oligozoospermia and 3.2 % in oligoasthenozoospermia and teratozoospermia cases. No significant differences in the deletion frequencies were observed between idiopathic vs non idiopathic cases (5.8 vs 8.6 % respectively). Deletions of AZFc were at highest frequency (46.6 %) with double deletions most commonly observed in azoospermic subjects. With respect to the STS markers, screening with the six European Academy of Andrology (EAA) markers would miss 3.1 % of cases; additional non EAA markers that would contribute significantly to screening are sY746, sY82, sY121, sY128, sY130, sY143, sY145 & sY160. INTERPRETATIONS AND

conclusionsThe frequency of Yq microdeletions is lower in Indian population as compared to Western counterparts. There is no major association of Yq microdeletions with seminal parameters or cause of infertility. Clinically it will be necessary to offer Yq microdeletion testing to all the classes of infertile men. The EAA markers may not be adequate to detect microdeletions in Indian infertile men.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, YAdultAzoospermiaChromosome DeletionHumansIndiaInfertility, MaleMaleOligospermiaSex Chromosome AberrationsSex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development

Identifiers

PMID23344732
PMCPMC3607676
OpenAlexW2067796770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.