Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344644›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2013

[Off-label use of drugs in pediatric emergencies: limitations and grey areas of drug approval].

C G Erker, M Möllmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C G ErkerKlinik für Anästhesie und operative Intensivmedizin, Bereich Kinderanästhesie, St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Hohenzollernring 72, 48145 Münster, Deutschland. christian.erker@sfh-muenster.de
M Möllmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the medical treatment of children drugs are frequently used outside the boundaries of the approved licensing and use under the terms of off-label use is possible. However, this requires critical reasoning and experience with the drug involved. With help of a traffic light colored spreadsheet this article illustrates the limitations, problems and possibilities of pharmacotherapy in pediatric emergencies or pediatric anesthesia. Of the 45 emergency drugs listed in this article most can be used in childhood, at least under specific conditions. Licensing restrictions occur especially in the newborn period and infancy resulting in frequent off-label use. Severe pitfalls, such as the propofol infusion syndrome after long-term sedation with propofol under the age of 16 years, emphasize the need for serious reflection on the substances involved. Decisions regarding pharmaceutical therapy should be based on the current standard of medical knowledge. When official recommendations from pharmaceutical companies are missing, treatment decisions for off-label use can be based on guidelines, study and literature databases or recommendations in medical journals.

Indexed as

Off-Label UseChildChild, PreschoolDrug ApprovalEmergency Medical ServicesGuidelines as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornPediatricsPharmacokineticsProcedural Sedation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.