Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344542›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2013

Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression.

Bram De Craene, Geert Berx

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,474 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,474citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
100.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,474 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2,511 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mechanisms of breast cancer dormancy in bone metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1,414 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bram De CraeneDepartment of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Technologiepark 927, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Geert Berx
Ghent University · BEVIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research · BE

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is essential for driving plasticity during development, but is an unintentional behaviour of cells during cancer progression. The EMT-associated reprogramming of cells not only suggests that fundamental changes may occur to several regulatory networks but also that an intimate interplay exists between them. Disturbance of a controlled epithelial balance is triggered by altering several layers of regulation, including the transcriptional and translational machinery, expression of non-coding RNAs, alternative splicing and protein stability.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionAnimalsDisease ProgressionEpithelial CellsHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23344542
OpenAlexW2016360721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.