Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23344510›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2013

Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.

Jukka Harju, Samuli Aspinen, Petri Juvonen, Hannu Kokki, Matti Eskelinen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy in cholelithiasis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jukka HarjuDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 263, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. jukka.harju@fimnet.fi
Samuli Aspinen
Petri Juvonen
Hannu Kokki
Matti Eskelinen
Kuopio University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) are the two most commonly performed mini-invasive surgical techniques for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease, but the long-term outcome after these two procedures has not been compared in prospective clinical trials. We therefore investigated the outcome after LC and MC in 127 patients operated at Kuopio University Hospital. PATIENTS AND

methodsInitially 157 patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were randomised to MC (n = 85) or LC (n = 72) over a 5-year period (1998-2004), and 127 of them (81 %), 69/85 with MC and 58/72 with LC, were reached for a follow-up interview 10.5 (7.3-13.6) years after the surgery.

resultsBaseline and surgical parameters were similar in the two groups; 3/69 MCs and 2/58 LCs were converted to open laparotomy. The prevalence of chronic post-surgical pain 10 years after procedure was similar in the two groups: 5/69 (7 %) in the MC group and 1/58 (2 %) in the LC group (p = 0.14). Residual abdominal symptoms were common, but less frequent in the MC group (14/69; 20 %) than in the LC group (21/58 patients; 36 %) (p = 0.039). In the MC group 63/69 (91 %) and 57/58 (98 %) in the LC group (p = 0.059) were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome.

conclusionOur results suggest a relatively similar long-term outcome after MC and LC.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicPatient Outcome AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedCholecystectomyEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparotomyMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative Pain

Identifiers

PMID23344510
OpenAlexW2025426495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.