Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23343138›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Blood pressure control and treatment adherence in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome: protocol of a randomized controlled study based on home blood pressure telemonitoring vs. conventional management and assessment of psychological determinants of adherence (TELEBPMET Study).

Gianfranco Parati, Stefano Omboni, Angelo Compare, Enzo Grossi, Edward Callus, Achille Venco, Maurizio Destro, Giuseppe Villa, Paolo Palatini, Enrico Agabiti Rosei and 46 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01541566 (Blood Pressure Control and Compliance to Treatment in Hypertensive Patients With Metabolic Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01541566 completednot on this map

Blood Pressure Control and Compliance to Treatment in Hypertensive Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: a Study Based on Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring

TypeobservationalSponsorItalian Institute of TelemedicineRan2007 to 2010Enrolled254ConditionsArterial Hypertension, Metabolic Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Home Blood Pressure and Telemedicine: A Modern Approach for Managing Hypertension During and After COVID-19 Pandemic.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical applications for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Lack of blood pressure control in Italy: room for improvement?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

56 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Gianfranco ParatiDepartment of Cardiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Luca, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, Italy. gianfranco.parati@unimib.it
Stefano Omboni
Angelo Compare
Enzo Grossi
Edward Callus
Achille Venco
Maurizio Destro
Giuseppe Villa
Paolo Palatini
Enrico Agabiti Rosei
Simonetta Scalvini
Stefano Taddei
Dario Manfellotto
Stefano Favale
Carmine De Matteis
Michele Guglielmi
TELEBPMET Study Group
Laura Lonati
Francesco Della Rosa
Ellen Tosazzi
Anna Maria Grandi
Andrea Maria Maresca
Christian Mongiardi
Micaela Mare
Alessandra Rossi Ricci
Francesca Cagnoni
Joannhe Georgatos
Valeria Besostri
Viviana Ferrari
Ombretta Omodeo
Francesca Dorigatti
Elisa Bonso
Chiara Guarnieri
Lorenza Muiesan
Anna Paini
Deborah Stassaldi
Angelo Cinelli
Palmira Bernocchi
Silvana Rocchi
Armando Magagna
Lorenzo Ghiadoni
Irene Del Frate
Francesca Boresi
Antonella Guidi
Maria Antonietta Re
Luisa Pellicciotti
Antonia Florio
Giuliana Morani
Silvana Di Lillo
Antonietta Ambrosio
Antonio Casciello
Maria Quaglia
Cinzia Forleo
Maria Annunziata Ardito
Stefania Gerunda
Mariligia Panunzio
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITCentro Diagnostico Italiano · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITItalian Institute of Telemedicine · ITPresidio Ospedaliero · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Bergamo · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInadequate blood pressure control and poor adherence to treatment remain among the major limitations in the management of hypertensive patients, particularly of those at high risk of cardiovascular events. Preliminary evidence suggests that home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) might help increasing the chance of achieving blood pressure targets and improve patient's therapeutic adherence. However, all these potential advantages of HBPT have not yet been fully investigated. METHODS/

designThe purpose of this open label, parallel group, randomized, controlled study is to assess whether, in patients with high cardiovascular risk (treated or untreated essential arterial hypertension--both in the office and in ambulatory conditions over 24 h--and metabolic syndrome), long-term (48 weeks) blood pressure control is more effective when based on HBPT and on the feedback to patients by their doctor between visits, or when based exclusively on blood pressure determination during quarterly office visits (conventional management (CM)). A total of 252 patients will be enrolled and randomized to usual care (n = 84) or HBPT (n = 168). The primary study endpoint will be the rate of subjects achieving normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure targets (< 135/85 mmHg) 24 weeks and 48 weeks after randomization. In addition, the study will assess the psychological determinants of adherence and persistence to drug therapy, through specific psychological tests administered during the course of the study. Other secondary study endpoints will be related to the impact of HBPT on additional clinical and economic outcomes (number of additional medical visits, direct costs of patient management, number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed, level of cardiovascular risk, degree of target organ damage and rate of cardiovascular events, regression of the metabolic syndrome). DISCUSSION: The TELEBPMET Study will show whether HBPT is effective in improving blood pressure control and related medical and economic outcomes in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. It will also provide a comprehensive understanding of the psychological determinants of medication adherence and blood pressure control of these patients.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov: NCT01541566.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsMedication AdherenceTelemedicineBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansHypertensionMetabolic SyndromeOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID23343138
PMCPMC3576326
OpenAlexW2169065879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.