Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23343014›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2013

Environmental exposure assessment in European birth cohorts: results from the ENRIECO project.

Ulrike Gehring, Maribel Casas, Bert Brunekreef, Anna Bergström, Jens Peter Bonde, Jérémie Botton, Cecile Chévrier, Sylvaine Cordier, Joachim Heinrich, Cynthia Hohmann and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Motivating Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women in Spain to Avoid Persistent Toxic Substances in Their Diet.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Inventory of European Birth Cohorts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Environmental health surveillance in a future European health information system.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Noise Effects on Health in the Context of Air Pollution Exposure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Review
  16. The health burden of pollution: the impact of prenatal exposure to air pollutants.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ulrike GehringInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. u.gehring@uu.nl
Maribel Casas
Bert Brunekreef
Anna Bergström
Jens Peter Bonde
Jérémie Botton
Cecile Chévrier
Sylvaine Cordier
Joachim Heinrich
Cynthia Hohmann
Thomas Keil
Jordi Sunyer
Christina G Tischer
Gunnar Toft
Magnus Wickman
Martine Vrijheid
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental exposures during pregnancy and early life may have adverse health effects. Single birth cohort studies often lack statistical power to tease out such effects reliably. To improve the use of existing data and to facilitate collaboration among these studies, an inventory of the environmental exposure and health data in these studies was made as part of the ENRIECO (Environmental Health Risks in European Birth Cohorts) project. The focus with regard to exposure was on outdoor air pollution, water contamination, allergens and biological organisms, metals, pesticides, smoking and second hand tobacco smoke (SHS), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), noise, radiation, and occupational exposures. The review lists methods and data on environmental exposures in 37 European birth cohort studies. Most data is currently available for smoking and SHS (N=37 cohorts), occupational exposures (N=33), outdoor air pollution, and allergens and microbial agents (N=27). Exposure modeling is increasingly used for long-term air pollution exposure assessment; biomonitoring is used for assessment of exposure to metals, POPs and other chemicals; and environmental monitoring for house dust mite exposure assessment. Collaborative analyses with data from several birth cohorts have already been performed successfully for outdoor air pollution, water contamination, allergens, biological contaminants, molds, POPs and SHS. Key success factors for collaborative analyses are common definitions of main exposure and health variables. Our review emphasizes that such common definitions need ideally be arrived at in the study design phase. However, careful comparison of methods used in existing studies also offers excellent opportunities for collaborative analyses. Investigators can use this review to evaluate the potential for future collaborative analyses with respect to data availability and methods used in the different cohorts and to identify potential partners for a specific research question.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureAllergensElectromagnetic FieldsEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsEuropeFemaleHumansModels, TheoreticalPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk AssessmentAllergensEnvironmental Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID23343014
PMCPMC3564791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.