Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23342286›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2012

Measuring colorectal cancer care quality for the publicly insured in New York State.

Amber H Sinclair, Maria J Schymura, Francis P Boscoe, Rachel L Yung, Kun Chen, Patrick Roohan, Eric Tai, Deborah Schrag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Relationship between Insurance Type at Diagnosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical, sociodemographic, and service provider determinants of guideline concordant colorectal cancer care for Appalachian residents.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amber H SinclairNew York State Department of Health, Cancer Registry, Albany, NY, USA.
Maria J Schymura
Francis P Boscoe
Rachel L Yung
Kun Chen
Patrick Roohan
Eric Tai
Deborah Schrag
New York State Department of Health · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Partnerships Between Medicaid, Tumor Registries & Cancer Control ResearchersK05CA169384 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SCHRAG, DEBORAH · 2012 to 2016
$586k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA169384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which concordance with colorectal cancer treatment quality metrics varies by patient characteristics in the publicly insured is not well understood. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of colorectal cancer care for publicly insured residents of New York State (NYS). NYS cancer registry data were linked to Medicaid and Medicare claims and hospital discharge data. We identified colorectal cancer cases diagnosed from 2004 through 2006 and evaluated three treatment quality measures: adjuvant chemotherapy within 4 months of diagnosis for American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) stage III colon cancer, adjuvant radiation within 6 months of diagnosis for AJCC stage IIB or III rectal cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy within 9 months of diagnosis for AJCC stage II-III rectal cancer. Concordance with guidelines was evaluated separately for Medicaid-enrollees under age 65 years and Medicare-enrollees aged 65-79 years. For adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer, 79.4% (274/345) of the Medicaid cohort and 71.8% (585/815) of the Medicare cohort were guideline concordant. For adjuvant radiation for rectal cancer, 72.3% (125/173) of the Medicaid cohort and 66.9% (206/308) of the Medicare cohort were concordant. For adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer, 89.5% (238/266) of the Medicaid cohort and 76.0% (392/516) of the Medicare cohort were concordant. Younger age was associated with higher adjusted odds of concordance for all three measures in the Medicare cohort. Racial differences were not evident in either cohort. There is room for improvement in concordance with accepted metrics of cancer care quality. Feedback about performance may assist in targeting efforts to improve care.

Indexed as

Age FactorsQuality of Health CareAgedColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMedicareMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNew YorkUnited StatesColorectal cancerguideline adherenceMedicaidMedicarequality of care

Identifiers

PMID23342286
PMCPMC3544457
OpenAlexW2079422612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.