Trial reportPloS one2013
Pain facilitation brain regions activated by nalbuphine are revealed by pharmacological fMRI.
Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can neuroimaging help combat the opioid epidemic? A systematic review of clinical and pharmacological challenge fMRI studies with recommendations for future research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Differential effects of oxycodone and venlafaxine on resting state functional connectivity-A randomized placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2018Trial
- Correlation of Pain Reduction with fMRI BOLD Response in Osteoarthritis Patients Treated with Paracetamol: Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Clinical Efficacy Study.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2018Trial
- The brain signature of paracetamol in healthy volunteers: a double-blind randomized trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Trial
- Explainable fNIRS-based pain decoding under pharmacological conditions via deep transfer learning approach.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- The Role of fMRI in Drug Development: An Update.Advances in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Is there hemispheric specialization in the chronic pain brain?Experimental neurology · 2022Review
- Nasal nalbuphine analgesia in prehospital trauma managed by first-responder personnel on ski slopes in Switzerland: an observational cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- The Opioid Crisis and the Future of Addiction and Pain Therapeutics.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019Review
- Reward and aversion processing in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: functional neuroimaging with visual and thermal stimuli.Translational psychiatry · 2018Article
- The role of fMRI in drug development.Drug discovery today · 2018Review
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful approach to probing the mechanism of action of therapeutic drugs that act on the central nervous system.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- A method for conducting functional MRI studies in alert nonhuman primates: initial results with opioid agonists in male cynomolgus monkeys.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2013Article
- Use of functional imaging across clinical phases in CNS drug development.Translational psychiatry · 2013Article
- Pain and analgesia: the value of salience circuits.Progress in neurobiology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nalbuphine, an agonist-antagonist kappa-opioid, produces brief analgesia followed by enhanced pain/hyperalgesia in male postsurgical patients. However, it produces profound analgesia without pain enhancement when co-administration with low dose naloxone. To examine the effect of nalbuphine or nalbuphine plus naloxone on activity in brain regions that may explain these differences, we employed pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) in a double blind cross-over study with 13 healthy male volunteers. In separate imaging sessions subjects were administered nalbuphine (5 mg/70 kg) preceded by either saline (Sal-Nalb) or naloxone 0.4 mg (Nalox-Nalb). Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activation maps followed by contrast and connectivity analyses revealed marked differences. Sal-Nalb produced significantly increased activity in 60 brain regions and decreased activity in 9; in contrast, Nalox-Nalb activated only 14 regions and deactivated only 3. Nalbuphine, like morphine in a previous study, attenuated activity in the inferior orbital cortex, and, like noxious stimulation, increased activity in temporal cortex, insula, pulvinar, caudate, and pons. Co-administration/pretreatment of naloxone selectively blocked activity in pulvinar, pons and posterior insula. Nalbuphine induced functional connectivity between caudate and regions in the frontal, occipital, temporal, insular, middle cingulate cortices, and putamen; naloxone co-admistration reduced all connectivity to non-significant levels, and, like phMRI measures of morphine, increased activation in other areas (e.g., putamen). Naloxone pretreatment to nalbuphine produced changes in brain activity possess characteristics of both analgesia and algesia; naloxone selectively blocks activity in areas associated with algesia. Given these findings, we suggest that nalbuphine interacts with a pain salience system, which can modulate perceived pain intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.