Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23341872›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Pain facilitation brain regions activated by nalbuphine are revealed by pharmacological fMRI.

Robert Gear, Lino Becerra, Jaymin Upadhyay, James Bishop, Diana Wallin, Gautam Pendse, Jon Levine, David Borsook

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. The Role of fMRI in Drug Development: An Update.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. The Opioid Crisis and the Future of Addiction and Pain Therapeutics.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The role of fMRI in drug development.Drug discovery today · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert GearDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lino Becerra
Jaymin Upadhyay
James Bishop
Diana Wallin
Gautam Pendse
Jon Levine
David Borsook
Harvard University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Modeling Kappa Opioid Analgesic Mechanisms in Chronic Orofacial Pain DisordersR01DE018526 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEVINE, JON DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$2.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE018526NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nalbuphine, an agonist-antagonist kappa-opioid, produces brief analgesia followed by enhanced pain/hyperalgesia in male postsurgical patients. However, it produces profound analgesia without pain enhancement when co-administration with low dose naloxone. To examine the effect of nalbuphine or nalbuphine plus naloxone on activity in brain regions that may explain these differences, we employed pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) in a double blind cross-over study with 13 healthy male volunteers. In separate imaging sessions subjects were administered nalbuphine (5 mg/70 kg) preceded by either saline (Sal-Nalb) or naloxone 0.4 mg (Nalox-Nalb). Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activation maps followed by contrast and connectivity analyses revealed marked differences. Sal-Nalb produced significantly increased activity in 60 brain regions and decreased activity in 9; in contrast, Nalox-Nalb activated only 14 regions and deactivated only 3. Nalbuphine, like morphine in a previous study, attenuated activity in the inferior orbital cortex, and, like noxious stimulation, increased activity in temporal cortex, insula, pulvinar, caudate, and pons. Co-administration/pretreatment of naloxone selectively blocked activity in pulvinar, pons and posterior insula. Nalbuphine induced functional connectivity between caudate and regions in the frontal, occipital, temporal, insular, middle cingulate cortices, and putamen; naloxone co-admistration reduced all connectivity to non-significant levels, and, like phMRI measures of morphine, increased activation in other areas (e.g., putamen). Naloxone pretreatment to nalbuphine produced changes in brain activity possess characteristics of both analgesia and algesia; naloxone selectively blocks activity in areas associated with algesia. Given these findings, we suggest that nalbuphine interacts with a pain salience system, which can modulate perceived pain intensity.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleNalbuphineNaloxoneNerve NetOrgan SpecificityOxygenPainPsychophysicsYoung AdultNalbuphineNaloxoneOxygen

Identifiers

PMID23341872
PMCPMC3540048
OpenAlexW2099769238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.