Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23341761›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

ADEMA: an algorithm to determine expected metabolite level alterations using mutual information.

A Ercument Cicek, Ilya Bederman, Leigh Henderson, Mitchell L Drumm, Gultekin Ozsoyoglu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An online system for metabolic network analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Ercument CicekDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. aec51@case.edu
Ilya Bederman
Leigh Henderson
Mitchell L Drumm
Gultekin Ozsoyoglu
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Translational Research in Cystic FibrosisP30DK027651 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DRUMM, MITCHELL L · 1986 to 2014
$15.6M
Systems Biology Approach to Growth Regulation in Cystic FibrosisR01GM088823 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DRUMM, MITCHELL L · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK027651NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics is a relatively new "omics" platform, which analyzes a discrete set of metabolites detected in bio-fluids or tissue samples of organisms. It has been used in a diverse array of studies to detect biomarkers and to determine activity rates for pathways based on changes due to disease or drugs. Recent improvements in analytical methodology and large sample throughput allow for creation of large datasets of metabolites that reflect changes in metabolic dynamics due to disease or a perturbation in the metabolic network. However, current methods of comprehensive analyses of large metabolic datasets (metabolomics) are limited, unlike other "omics" approaches where complex techniques for analyzing coexpression/coregulation of multiple variables are applied. This paper discusses the shortcomings of current metabolomics data analysis techniques, and proposes a new multivariate technique (ADEMA) based on mutual information to identify expected metabolite level changes with respect to a specific condition. We show that ADEMA better predicts De Novo Lipogenesis pathway metabolite level changes in samples with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) than prediction based on the significance of individual metabolite level changes. We also applied ADEMA's classification scheme on three different cohorts of CF and wildtype mice. ADEMA was able to predict whether an unknown mouse has a CF or a wildtype genotype with 1.0, 0.84, and 0.9 accuracy for each respective dataset. ADEMA results had up to 31% higher accuracy as compared to other classification algorithms. In conclusion, ADEMA advances the state-of-the-art in metabolomics analysis, by providing accurate and interpretable classification results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolomicsAnimalsLipogenesisMiceModels, TheoreticalMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23341761
PMCPMC3547803
OpenAlexW1993967688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.