Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23341080›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2013

The social contagion hypothesis: comment on 'Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior'.

A C Thomas

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  4. Evaluating reproductive decisions as discrete choices under social influence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A C ThomasDepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A. acthomas@stat.cmu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

I reflect on the statistical methods of the Christakis-Fowler studies on network-based contagion of traits by checking the sensitivity of these kinds of results to various alternate specifications and generative mechanisms. Despite the honest efforts of all involved, I remain pessimistic about establishing whether binary health outcomes or product adoptions are contagious if the evidence comes from simultaneously observed data.

Indexed as

BehaviorModels, PsychologicalSocial SupportHumans

Identifiers

PMID23341080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.