Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23340726›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2013

[Varicocele in adolescents].

K Czeloth, T Kälble, S Kliesch

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Variocele in adolescents].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2014
    Article
  3. Editorial comment.Central European journal of urology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K CzelothAbteilung für Klinische Andrologie, Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie.
T Kälble
S Kliesch
University Hospital Münster · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular varicocele is present in 15 % of adolescent boys. The very impact of this pathology and who will be at risk of developing into infertility remains unclear. Research on the pathophysiology, results of surgical or radiological interventions and potential predictors for long-term impairment of spermatogenesis and thus fertility is still ongoing. Indications for treatment are mainly based on differences in testicular volumes as semen parameters are most often not available; however, whether testicular volume is a valuable prognostic parameter for later fertility remains questionable. Approximately 50 % of adolescent patients with varicocele experience spontaneous increase of testicular volume without any intervention.

Indexed as

AdolescentHumansInfertility, MaleMaleVaricoceleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23340726
OpenAlexW2184703741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.