Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23340707›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2013

Mosquito net mesh for abdominal wall hernioplasty: a comparison of material characteristics with commercial prosthetics.

David L Sanders, Andrew N Kingsnorth, Brian M Stephenson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03324854 (Use of Mosquito Net Mesh in Comparison With Polypropylene Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03324854 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Use of Mosquito Net Mesh in Comparison With Polypropylene Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled20ConditionsHernia, Ventral, Ventral Incisional HerniaArmsRives technique, Drainage, Prophylactic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David L SandersDepartment of Surgery, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, TR1 3LJ, UK. dsanders@doctors.org.uk
Andrew N Kingsnorth
Brian M Stephenson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of sterilized mosquito net as a cheaper alternative to commercial mesh used in hernia repair has previously been published. However, as no standards with regard to the material have been documented, we aimed to define the characteristics of a commonly available and low-cost mosquito net, which has already been shown to be clinically efficacious in groin hernia repair. We compared its characteristics to other commercially available meshes, in keeping with the well-established FDA and MHRA regulatory processes.

methodsThe macromolecular structure of the mosquito net was determined by vibrational spectroscopy. The ultrastructure of the meshes was examined with scanning electron microscopy, and uniaxial and burst tensile strength testing was performed. The following parameters were assessed: polymer type, filament characteristics, pore size, weight, linear density, elasticity, and tensile strength.

resultsThe mosquito net was a polyethylene homopolymer, knitted from monofilament fibers with a mean filament diameter of 109.7 μm and a mean mesh thickness of 480 μm. The mean pore maximum diameter was 1.9 mm, with 91.2 % porosity, 53.7 g/m(2) mean mesh weight, and a linear mass density of 152 denier. This was comparable to the "large pore" (class I) commercial meshes. The bursting force for polyethylene mosquito net was greater than for UltraPro and Vypro (43.0 vs. 35.5 and 27.2 N/cm, respectively), and the mosquito net exhibited less anisotropy compared to the commercial meshes.

conclusionsThe material and mechanical properties of the polyethylene mosquito net are substantially equivalent to those of commonly used lightweight commercial meshes.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaMosquito NetsSurgical MeshElasticityHerniorrhaphyHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPolyethylenePorositySpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTensile StrengthPolyethylene

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.