ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2013
[Combination therapy of benign prostate syndrome/lower urinary tract symptoms].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathophysiology of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is multifactorial. The fact that none of the available drugs impacts on more than one of these pathomechanisms, provides the rationale for combined medical treatment strategies. The combination of α-blocker and a 5-reductase inhibitor is recommended by all major benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH/LUTS) guidelines as a first line approach for men with moderate to severe LUTS and a higher risk for disease progression. The efficacy of this approach has been proven in prospective randomized trials for up to 4 years. The combination of α-blocker and antimuscarinics has been tested in several randomized trials as a primary approach or as add on therapy but the maximum study duration was only 3 months. The add on approach is suitable in particular for men with persisting storage symptoms under α-blockade. The risk for acute retention in appropriately selected men is low. The scientific basis for all other combinations is not solid enough to recommend the use outside clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.