ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013
Newborn bloodspot screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: 21 years experience in Wales (UK).
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05753462 (Phase 1/2a, Monocentric, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, PK and PD of SQY51 in Paediatric and Adult Patients With a Genetically Confirmed Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 136 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1/2a, Monocentric, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, PK and PD of SQY51 in Paediatric and Adult Patients With a Genetically Confirmed Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell Therapy Strategies on Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Pooled it
- The clinical course of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the corticosteroid treatment era: a systematic literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Life expectancy at birth in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Pooled it
- CRISPR-cas gene-editing as plausible treatment of neuromuscular and nucleotide-repeat-expansion diseases: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Pooled it
- The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Gene x environment interaction analysis confirms genetic modifier effects on steroid efficacy via TGF-β pathway in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Genes · 2026Review
- Neonatal screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in eastern China: a closed prospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Empagliflozin preserves cardiac function and modulates metabolism in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on expanding newborn genomic screening in the emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: insights from a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A new dystrophin-deficient rat model mirroring exon skipping in patients with DMD exon 45 deletions.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Experiences of parents who receive a false-positive CK-MM screening for their newborn.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Article
- Visualizing ambulatory performance by age and rates of decline among patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Article
- A Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Inform Extension of the Eteplirsen Dosing Regimen Across the Broad DMD Population.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a progressive X-linked neuromuscular disorder, has an estimated worldwide incidence of 1:3500 male births. Currently, there are no curative treatments and the mean age of diagnosis is 5 years. In addition, subsequent pregnancies frequently occur before a diagnosis is made in an index case. An 'opt in' screening programme was introduced in Wales in 1990 with the aim to: reduce the diagnostic delay, permit reproductive choice and allow planning of the care of the affected boy. Newborn bloodspots were collected routinely as part of the Wales newborn screening programme. Specific consent was obtained for this test separately from the other tests. During the 21-year period, 369,780 bloodspot cards were received from male infants, of these 343,170 (92.8%) were screened using a bloodspot creatine kinase (CK) assay following parental consent. A total of 145 cases had a raised CK activity (≥250 U/l) and at follow-up, at 6-8 weeks of age, 79 cases had a normal serum CK (false-positive rate 0.023%) and 66 cases had an elevated serum CK. DMD was confirmed in 56 cases by genotyping/muscle biopsy studies, Becker muscular dystrophy in 5 cases and other rarer forms of muscular dystrophy in 5 cases. This long-term study has so far identified 13 false-negative cases. The incidence of DMD in Wales of 1:5136 during this period is lower than that of 1:4046 before commencement of screening in Wales. Screening has reduced the diagnostic delay enabling reproductive choice for parents of affected boys and earlier administration of current therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.