Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23340160›Full record

ReviewBrain research2013

Window of opportunity: estrogen as a treatment for ischemic stroke.

Ran Liu, Shao-Hua Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sex differences in autonomic responses to stress: implications for cardiometabolic physiology.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ran LiuDepartments of Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
Shao-Hua Yang
University of North Texas · US

Funding

Vascular Cognitive Impairment Induced by Ischemic Stroke: mechanism and therapyR01NS054651 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI YANG, SHAOHUA · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Interaction of Estrogen and Tissue Plasminogen ActivatorR01NS054687 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI YANG, SHAOHUA · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
NINDS NIH HHS NS054651NINDS NIH HHS NS054687NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054651NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroprotection research in the last 2 decades has witnessed a growing interest in the functions of estrogens as neuroprotectants against neurodegenerative diseases including stroke. The neuroprotective action of estrogens has been well demonstrated in both in vitro and in vivo models of ischemic stroke. However, the major conducted clinical trials so far have raised concern for the protective effect of estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. The discrepancy could be partly due to the mistranslation between the experimental stroke research and clinical trials. While predominant experimental studies tested the protective action of estrogens on ischemic stroke using acute treatment paradigm, the clinical trials have mainly focused on the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the primary and secondary stroke prevention which has not been adequately addressed in the experimental stroke study. Although the major conducted clinical trials have indicated that estrogen replacement therapy has an adverse effect and raise concern for long term estrogen replacement therapy for stroke prevention, these are not appropriate for assessing the potential effects of acute estrogen treatment on stroke protection. The well established action of estrogen in the neurovascular unit and its potential interaction with recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator (rtPA) makes it a candidate for the combined therapy with rtPA for the acute treatment of ischemic stroke. On the other hand, the "critical period" and newly emerged "biomarkers window" hypotheses have indicated that many clinical relevant factors have been underestimated in the experimental ischemic stroke research. The development and application of ischemic stroke models that replicate the clinical condition is essential for further evaluation of acute estrogen treatment on ischemic stroke which might provide critical information for future clinical trials. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Hormone Therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaClinical Trials as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationEstrogensFemaleHumansMaleNeuroprotective AgentsStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorEstrogensNeuroprotective AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID23340160
PMCPMC3664650
OpenAlexW1971357941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.