Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23339773›Full record

Trial reportBMC family practice2013

In-vivo-validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction tool: the arriba-pro study.

Annette Diener, Salomé Celemín-Heinrich, Karl Wegscheider, Kai Kolpatzik, Katrin Tomaschko, Attila Altiner, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff, Jörg Haasenritter

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC family practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polyscore of autonomic parameters for risk stratification of the elderly general population: the Polyscore study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Improving long-term adherence to statin therapy: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Annette DienerInstitute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, 18055, Rostock, Germany. annette.diener@med.uni-rostock.de
Salomé Celemín-Heinrich
Karl Wegscheider
Kai Kolpatzik
Katrin Tomaschko
Attila Altiner
Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Jörg Haasenritter
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEAOK · DEGerman Medical Association · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalculation of individual risk is the cornerstone of effective cardiovascular prevention. arriba is a software to estimate the individual risk to suffer a cardiovascular event in 10 years. Prognosis and the absolute effects of pharmacological and lifestyle interventions help the patient make a well-informed decision. The risk calculation algorithm currently used in arriba is based on the Framingham risk algorithm calibrated to the German setting. The objective of this study is to evaluate and adapt the algorithm for the target population in primary care in Germany. METHODS/

designarriba-pro will be conducted within the primary care scheme provided by a large health care insurer in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Patients who are counseled with arriba by their general practitioners (GPs) will be included in the arriba-pro cohort. Exposure data from the consultation with arriba such as demographic data and risk factors will be recorded automatically by the practice software and transferred to the study centre. Information on relevant prescription drugs (effect modifiers) and cardiovascular events (outcomes) will be derived from administrative sources. DISCUSSION: The study is unique in simulating a therapy naïve cohort, matching exactly research and application setting, using a robust administrative data base, and, finally, including patients with known cardiovascular disease who have been excluded from previous studies.

trial registrationThe study is registered with Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00004633).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrimary Health CarePrimary PreventionSoftwareCardiovascular DiseasesGermanyHumansResearch DesignRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID23339773
PMCPMC3583804
OpenAlexW2130117664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.