Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23339736›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Early treatment of posterior crossbite--a randomised clinical trial.

Carsten Lippold, Thomas Stamm, Ulrich Meyer, András Végh, Tatjana Moiseenko, Gholamreza Danesh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03353766 (The Effect of Timing on Lateral Crossbite Correction - a Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03353766 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Timing on Lateral Crossbite Correction - a Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2016 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsMalocclusion, CrossbiteArmsEarly crossbite correction with Q-H Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carsten LippoldPoliklinik für Kieferorthopädie, Universität Münster, Waldeyerstr 30, 48149 Münster, Germany. lippold@uni-muenster.de
Thomas Stamm
Ulrich Meyer
András Végh
Tatjana Moiseenko
Gholamreza Danesh
Heim Pál Gyermekkórház · HUKlinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this randomised clinical trial was to assess the effect of early orthodontic treatment in contrast to normal growth effects for functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition by means of three-dimensional digital model analysis.

methodsThis randomised clinical trial was assessed to analyse the orthodontic treatment effects for patients with functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition using a two-step procedure: initial maxillary expansion followed by a U-bow activator therapy. In the treatment group 31 patients and in the control group 35 patients with a mean age of 7.3 years (SD 2.1) were monitored. The time between the initial assessment (T1) and the follow-up (T2) was one year. The orthodontic analysis was done by a three-dimensional digital model analysis. Using the 'Digimodel' software, the orthodontic measurements in the maxilla and mandible and for the midline deviation, the overjet and overbite were recorded.

resultsSignificant differences between the control and the therapy group at T2 were detected for the anterior, median and posterior transversal dimensions of the maxilla, the palatal depth, the palatal base arch length, the maxillary arch length and inclination, the midline deviation, the overjet and the overbite.

conclusionsOrthodontic treatment of a functional unilateral posterior crossbite with a bonded maxillary expansion device followed by U-bow activator therapy in the late deciduous and early mixed dentition is an effective therapeutic method, as evidenced by the results of this RCT. It leads to three-dimensional therapeutically induced maxillary growth effects. Dental occlusion is significantly improved, and the prognosis for normal craniofacial growth is enhanced.

trial registrationRegistration trial DRKS00003497 on DRKS.

Indexed as

Dental OcclusionDentition, MixedTooth, DeciduousChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMalocclusionMaxillaPalatal Expansion TechniquePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID23339736
PMCPMC3560255
OpenAlexW2094286914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.