Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23339238›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Polyandry and sex-specific gene expression.

Judith E Mank, Nina Wedell, David J Hosken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The polyandry revolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  13. Proximate perspectives on the evolution of female aggression: good for the gander, good for the goose?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, The Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. judith.mank@ucl.ac.uk
Nina Wedell
David J Hosken

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H002006/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyandry is widespread in nature, and has important evolutionary consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism and sexual conflict. Although many of the phenotypic consequences of polyandry have been elucidated, our understanding of the impacts of polyandry and mating systems on the genome is in its infancy. Polyandry can intensify selection on sexual characters and generate more intense sexual conflict. This has consequences for sequence evolution, but also for sex-biased gene expression, which acts as a link between mating systems, sex-specific selection and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. We discuss this and the remarkable confluence of sexual-conflict theory and patterns of gene expression, while also making predictions about transcription patterns, mating systems and sexual conflict. Gene expression is a key link in the genotype-phenotype chain, and although in its early stages, understanding the sexual selection-transcription relationship will provide significant insights into this critical association.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionConflict, PsychologicalModels, BiologicalSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleGene Expression RegulationMaleMating Preference, AnimalSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID23339238
PMCPMC3576581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.