Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23339235›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Selection on female remating interval is influenced by male sperm competition strategies and ejaculate characteristics.

Suzanne H Alonzo, Tommaso Pizzari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  14. Sexual conflict over remating interval is modulated by theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Beyond sex allocation: the role of mating systems in sexual selection in parasitoid wasps.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Sexual conflict arising from extrapair matings in birds.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Sexual cannibalism as a manifestation of sexual conflict.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne H AlonzoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06517, USA. suzanne.alonzo@yale.edu
Tommaso Pizzari
University of Oxford · GBYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female remating rate dictates the level of sperm competition in a population, and extensive research has focused on how sperm competition generates selection on male ejaculate allocation. Yet the way ejaculate allocation strategies in turn generate selection on female remating rates, which ultimately influence levels of sperm competition, has received much less consideration despite increasing evidence that both mating itself and ejaculate traits affect multiple components of female fitness. Here, we develop theory to examine how the effects of mating on female fertility, fecundity and mortality interact to generate selection on female remating rate. When males produce more fertile ejaculates, females are selected to mate less frequently, thus decreasing levels of sperm competition. This could in turn favour decreased male ejaculate allocation, which could subsequently lead to higher female remating. When remating simultaneously increases female fecundity and mortality, females are selected to mate more frequently, thus exacerbating sperm competition and favouring male traits that convey a competitive advantage even when harmful to female survival. While intuitive when considered separately, these predictions demonstrate the potential for complex coevolutionary dynamics between male ejaculate expenditure and female remating rate, and the correlated evolution of multiple male and female reproductive traits affecting mating, fertility and fecundity.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCompetitive BehaviorFemaleFertilityMaleMating Preference, AnimalModels, BiologicalSemenSexual Behavior, AnimalSpermatozoaTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23339235
PMCPMC3576578
OpenAlexW2063004176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.