Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23338968›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2013

Soluble FAS in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab and irinotecan for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Jordi Codony-Servat, Xabier Garcia-Albeniz, Carles Pericay, Vicente Alonso, Pilar Escudero, Carlos Fernández-Martos, Rosa Gallego, Anna Martínez-Cardús, Eva Martinez-Balibrea, Joan Maurel

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Implementation of validated pharmacodynamic assays in multiple laboratories: challenges, successes, and limitations.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jordi Codony-ServatMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. jordicodonyservat@yahoo.es
Xabier Garcia-Albeniz
Carles Pericay
Vicente Alonso
Pilar Escudero
Carlos Fernández-Martos
Rosa Gallego
Anna Martínez-Cardús
Eva Martinez-Balibrea
Joan Maurel
Universitat de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESDeleted InstitutionFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The FAS/FASL system, comprising membrane-bound (mFAS and mFASL) and soluble forms (sFAS and sFASL), has been related to apoptosis driven by chemotherapy administration. In vitro experiments show chemotherapy upregulating membrane-bound forms, leading to an increase of receptor availability (at 24-72 h) and favoring apoptosis. The regulatory effect of chemotherapy on sFAS in patients has never been explored prospectively in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). We performed a pharmacodynamic study to address sFAS/sFASL variation. A prospective phase II translational multicenter study was designed to evaluate progression-free rate (PFR) in patients with ACRC treated with irinotecan and cetuximab in third-line therapy. The effect of sFAS was studied in vitro in colorectal cancer cell lines. Our results showed that statistically significant changes were observed in sFAS at 24-72 h compared to baseline levels in the pharmacodynamic study. Of the 93 patients enrolled in the prospective study in third-line therapy with cetuximab-irinotecan, 85 were evaluated for sFAS/sFASL changes at 48 h. There was no difference in PFR at 4 months between patients with sFAS and sFASL changes. In vitro analysis showed that although LoVo cell lines were sensitive to oxaliplatin and fluorouracil due to modulation of sFAS and FAS, HT29 lines were not. In summary, chemotherapy regulates FAS soluble fractions in vitro and in vivo, but does not predict PFR in ACRC patients undergoing third-line therapy with the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBlotting, WesternCamptothecinCell Line, TumorCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorFemaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkers, TumorCamptothecinCetuximabFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorIrinotecan

Identifiers

PMID23338968
OpenAlexW2065505490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.