Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23338663›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

N Lefevre, Y Bohu, J F Naouri, S Klouche, S Herman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02511158 (Prospective Follow-up Study of Patients Undergoing Knee Ligament Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02511158 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Follow-up Study of Patients Undergoing Knee Ligament Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFonds de Dotation pour la Recherche Clinique en Orthopédie et Pathologie du SportRan2012 to 2052Enrolled7,000ConditionsRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament, OsteoarthritisArmsLigament of the knee reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anterior knee translation measurements after ACL reconstruction are influenced by the type of laximeter used.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  20. Joint laxity and graft compliance increase during the first year following ACL reconstruction with short hamstring tendon grafts.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N LefevreOrthopaedic Surgery Department, Clinique du Sport Paris V, 75005, Paris, France, docteurlefevre@club-internet.fr.
Y Bohu
J F Naouri
S Klouche
S Herman
Clinique du Sport · FRInstitut de France · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main goal of this study was to compare the results of the GNRB(®) arthrometer to those of Telos™ in the diagnosis of partial thickness tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

methodsA prospective study performed January-December 2011 included all patients presenting with a partial or full-thickness ACL tears without ACL reconstruction and with a healthy contralateral knee. Anterior laxity was measured in all patients by the Telos™ and GNRB(®) devices. This series included 139 patients, mean age 30.7 ± 9.3 years. Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 109 patients, 97 for complete tears and 12 single bundle reconstructions for partial thickness tears. Conservative treatment was proposed in 30 patients with a partial thickness tear. The correlation between the two devices was evaluated by the Spearman coefficient. The optimal laxity thresholds were determined with ROC curves, and the diagnostic value of the tests was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsThe differential laxities of full and partial thickness tears were significantly different with the two tests. The correlation between the results of laxity measurement with the two devices was fair, with the strongest correlation between Telos™ 250 N and GNRB(®) 250 N (r = 0.46, p = 0.00001). Evaluation of the AUC showed that the informative value of all tests was fair with the best results with the GNRB(®) 250 N: AUC = 0.89 [95 % CI 0.83-0.94]. The optimal differential laxity threshold with the GNRB(®) 250 N was 2.5 mm (Se = 84 %, Sp = 81 %).

conclusionThe diagnostic value of GNRB(®) was better than Telos™ for ACL partial thickness tears.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentArthrometry, ArticularFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleProspective StudiesROC CurveRupture

Identifiers

PMID23338663
OpenAlexW2081057360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.