Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23338209›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2013

Renal progenitors: an evolutionary conserved strategy for kidney regeneration.

Paola Romagnani, Laura Lasagni, Giuseppe Remuzzi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Life of a Kidney Podocyte.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Hold the salt for kidney regeneration.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Principles of Zebrafish Nephron Segment Development.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paola RomagnaniPediatric Nephrology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy. p.romagnani@dfc.unifi.it
Laura Lasagni
Giuseppe Remuzzi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following kidney injury, repair can result in functional tissue becoming a patch of cells and disorganized extracellular matrix--a scar--or it can recapitulate the original tissue architecture through the process of regeneration. Regeneration can potentially occur in all animal species and humans. Indeed, the repair of portions of the existing nephron after tubular damage, a response that has been designated classically as cellular regeneration, is conserved in all animal species from the ancestral phases of evolution. By contrast, another type of regenerative response--nephron neogenesis--has been described in lower branches of the animal kingdom, but does not occur in adult mammals. Converging evidence suggests that a renal progenitor system is present in the adult kidney across different stages of evolution, with renal progenitors having been identified as the main drivers of kidney regenerative responses in fish, insects, rodents and humans. In this Review, we describe similarities and differences between the renal progenitor systems through evolution, and propose explanations for how progressive kidney adaptation to environmental changes both required and permitted neonephrogenesis to be given up and for cellular regeneration to be retained as the main regenerative strategy. Understanding the mechanisms that drive renal progenitor growth and differentiation represent the key step for modulating this potential for therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnimalsBiological EvolutionDrosophilaHumansKidneyNephronsOrganogenesisRegenerationStem Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.