Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23337873›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2013

Formation of protein complexes in crowded environments--from in vitro to in vivo.

Yael Phillip, Gideon Schreiber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural Study of DNA in Simulated Crowded Fluids.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In-cell destabilization of a homodimeric protein complex detected by DEER spectroscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Depletion interactions modulate the binding between disordered proteins in crowded environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yael PhillipDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Gideon Schreiber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, biochemical studies are performed in dilute homogenous solutions, which are very different from the dense mixture of molecules found in cells. Thus, the physiological relevance of these studies is in question. This recognition motivated scientists to formulate the effect of crowded solutions in general, and excluded volume in particular, on biochemical processes. Using polymers or proteins as crowders, it was shown that while crowding tends to significantly enhance the formation of complexes containing many subunits, dimerizations are only mildly affected. Computer simulations, together with experimental evidence, indicate soft interactions and diffusion as critical factors that operate in a concerted manner with excluded volume to modulate protein binding. Yet, these approaches do not truly mimic the cellular environment. In vivo studies may overcome this shortfall. The few studies conducted thus far suggest that in cells, binding and folding occur at rates close to those determined in dilute solutions. Obtaining quantitative biochemical information on reactions inside living cells is currently a main challenge of the field, as the complexity of the intracellular milieu was what motivated crowding research to begin with.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDiffusionHumansIntracellular SpaceMacromolecular SubstancesModels, BiologicalModels, ChemicalProtein BindingProteinsSolutionsMacromolecular SubstancesProteinsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID23337873
PMCPMC7094571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.