Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23337742›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2013

Optimizing gene transfer to conventional outflow cells in living mouse eyes.

G Li, P Gonzalez, L J Camras, I Navarro, J Qiu, P Challa, W D Stamer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of trabecular meshwork-specific promotersInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  3. Viral Vector-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inducible rodent models of glaucoma.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3802, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
P Gonzalez
L J Camras
I Navarro
J Qiu
P Challa
W D Stamer
Duke University · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY005722 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Vadim Y Arshavsky · 1985 to 2026
$19.3M
eNOS-Dependent Mechanoregulation of Intraocular PressureR01EY022359 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAMER, W DANIEL · 2012 to 2025
$5.6M
Cellular Senescence and GlaucomaR01EY016228 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GONZALEZ, PEDRO · 2005 to 2011
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS EY016228NEI NIH HHS P30 EY005722NEI NIH HHS P30EY005722NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016228NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022359NEI NIH HHS R01EY022359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse eye has physiological and genetic advantages to study conventional outflow function. However, its small size and shallow anterior chamber presents technical challenges to efficient intracameral delivery of genetic material to conventional outflow cells. The goal of this study was to optimize methods to overcome this technical hurdle, without damaging ocular structures or compromising outflow function. Gene targeting was monitored by immunofluorescence microscopy after transduction of adenovirus encoding green fluorescent protein driven by a CMV promoter. Guided by a micromanipulator and stereomicroscope, virus was delivered intracamerally to anesthetized mice by bolus injection using a 33 gauge needle attached to Hamilton syringe or infusion with glass micropipette connected to syringe pump. The total number of particles introduced remained constant, while volume of injected virus solution (3-10 μl) was varied for each method and time of infusion (3-40 min) tested. Outflow facility and intraocular pressure were monitored invasively using established techniques. Unlike bolus injections or slow infusions, introduction of virus intracamerally during rapid infusions (3 min) at any volume tested preferentially targeted trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal cells, with minimal transduction of neighboring cells. While infusions resulted in transient intraocular pressure spikes (commensurate with volume infused, Δ40-70 mmHg), eyes typically recovered within 60 min. Transduced eyes displayed normal outflow facility and tissue morphology 3-6 days after infusions. Taken together, fast infusion of virus solution in small volumes intracamerally is a novel and effective method to selectively deliver agents to conventional outflow cells in living mice.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAdenoviridaeAnimalsAnterior Eye SegmentAqueous HumorCytomegalovirusEyeGenetic TherapyGlaucomaGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInjections, IntraocularIntraocular PressureMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroinjectionsMicroscopy, FluorescenceGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23337742
PMCPMC3615119
OpenAlexW2031233825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.