Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23336836›Full record

ArticleInformatics in primary care2012

Implementation of a web-based tool for patient medication self-management: the Medication Self-titration Evaluation Programme (Med-STEP) for blood pressure control.

Richard W Grant, Jennifer C Pandiscio, Hannah Pajolek, Alyssa Woulfe, Alexandra Pelletier, Joseph Kvedar, Elyse R Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Informatics in primary care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pharmacist-Directed Self-Management of Blood Pressure Versus Conventional Management in Patients with Hypertension: A Randomized Control Trial.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Improving management and effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring: a qualitative UK primary care study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard W GrantDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
Jennifer C Pandiscio
Hannah Pajolek
Alyssa Woulfe
Alexandra Pelletier
Joseph Kvedar
Elyse R Park
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPartners HealthCare Connected Health · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Overcoming Barriers to Evidence-Based Diabetes CareK23DK067452 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GRANT, RICHARD W · 2005 to 2009
$653k
Patient Medication Self-Titration for Diabetes Risk Factor ControlR03DK080183 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GRANT, RICHARD W · 2008 to 2009
$176k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK067452NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK080183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformatics tools may help support hypertension management.

objectiveTo design, implement and evaluate a web-based system for patient anti-hypertensive medication self-titration.

methodsStudy stages included: six focus groups (50 patients) to identify barriers/facilitators to patient medication self-titration, software design informed by qualitative analysis of focus group responses and a six-month single-arm pilot study (20 patients) to assess implementation feasibility.

resultsFocus groups emphasised patient need to feel confident that their own primary care providers were directly involved and approved of the titration protocol. Physicians required 3.3 ± 2.8 minutes/patient to create individualised six-step medication pathways for once-monthly blood pressure evaluations. Pilot participants (mean age of 51.5 ± 11 years, 45% women, mean baseline blood pressure 139/84 ± 12.2/7.5 mmHg) had five medication increases, two non-adherence self-reports, 52 months not requiring medication changes, 24 skipped months and 17 months with no evaluations due to technical issues. Four pilot patients dropped out before study completion. From baseline to study completion, blood pressure decreased among the 16 patients remaining in the study (8.0/4.7 mmHg, p = 0.03 for both systolic and diastolic pressures).

conclusionsLessons learned included the benefit of qualitative patient analysis prior to system development and the feasibility of physicians designing individual treatment pathways. Any potential clinical benefits were offset by technical problems, the tendency for patients to skip their monthly self-evaluations and drop outs. To be more widely adopted such systems must effectively generalise to a wider range of patients and be integrated into clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsInternetAdultAntihypertensive AgentsAwarenessBlood PressureFemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypertensionMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMotivationPilot ProjectsSelf AdministrationAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23336836
PMCPMC3829638
OpenAlexW2004660903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.