Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23336825›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of speech-language pathology2013

Outcomes of tongue-pressure strength and accuracy training for dysphagia following acquired brain injury.

Catriona M Steele, Gemma L Bailey, Rebecca E Cliffe Polacco, Sarah F Hori, Sonja M Molfenter, Mohamed Oshalla, Erin M Yeates

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of speech-language pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catriona M SteeleToronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network , Toronto, Ontario , Canada.
Gemma L Bailey
Rebecca E Cliffe Polacco
Sarah F Hori
Sonja M Molfenter
Mohamed Oshalla
Erin M Yeates

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 69521Canadian Institutes of Health Research 82668Canadian Institutes of Health Research 83888Canadian Institutes of Health Research 84534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure treatment outcomes in a group of six adults with chronic dysphagia following acquired brain injury, who each completed 24 sessions of tongue-pressure resistance training, over a total of 11-12 weeks. The treatment protocol emphasized both strength and accuracy. Biofeedback was provided using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Amplitude accuracy targets were set between 20-90% of the patient's maximum isometric pressure capacity. Single subject methods were used to track changes in tongue strength (maximum isometric pressures), with functional swallowing outcomes measured using blinded ratings of a standard pre- and post-treatment videofluoroscopy protocol. Improvements were seen in post-treatment measures of tongue pressure and penetration-aspiration. No improvements were seen in pharyngeal residues, indeed worsening residue was seen in some patients.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdultBiofeedback, PsychologyBrain InjuriesDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPressureTongueTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23336825
PMCPMC3793268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.