Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2013
Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke.
Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Exercise in Improving Physical Function of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- A feasibility study on the use of cranial nerve non-invasive neuromodulation to improve affected arm function in people in the chronic stage of a stroke.BMC neurology · 2025Trial
- Long-Dose Intensive Therapy Is Necessary for Strong, Clinically Significant, Upper Limb Functional Gains and Retained Gains in Severe/Moderate Chronic Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Inter-limb force coupling is resistant to distorted visual feedback in chronic hemiparetic stroke.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2014Trial
- Article
- Are Changes in Corticomotor Excitability Associated with Improved Arm Functional Performance Following a Tailored Strength Training Intervention in Chronic Stroke Survivors?Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Pathophysiology and Management Strategies for Post-Stroke Spasticity: An Update Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Muscle fascicle length adaptations to high-velocity training in young adults with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- LONG-TERM BENEFITS OF A TAILORED STRENGTH TRAINING INTERVENTION ON ARM FUNCTION IN CHRONIC STROKE SURVIVORS: A FOLLOW-UP STUDY.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2025Article
- Effects of Resistance Training on Spasticity in People with Stroke: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) and postural control in individuals with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of a tailored upper extremity strength training intervention combined with direct current stimulation in chronic stroke survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Robotic Rehabilitation and Multimodal Instrumented Assessment of Post-stroke Elbow Motor Functions-A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- A Portable Passive Rehabilitation Robot for Upper-Extremity Functional Resistance Training.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019Article
- Progressive Abduction Loading Therapy with Horizontal-Plane Viscous Resistance Targeting Weakness and Flexion Synergy to Treat Upper Limb Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Microstructural properties of premotor pathways predict visuomotor performance in chronic stroke.Human brain mapping · 2016Article
- Effect of a mixed reality-based intervention on arm, hand, and finger function on chronic stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2016Review
- Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: why it matters.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepetitive task practice is argued to drive neural plasticity following stroke. However, current evidence reveals that hemiparetic weakness impairs the capacity to perform, and practice, movements appropriately. Here we investigated how power training (i.e., high-intensity, dynamic resistance training) affects recovery of upper-extremity motor function post-stroke. We hypothesized that power training, as a component of upper-extremity rehabilitation, would promote greater functional gains than functional task practice without deleterious consequences.
methodNineteen chronic hemiparetic individuals were studied using a crossover design. All participants received both functional task practice (FTP) and HYBRID (combined FTP and power training) in random order. Blinded evaluations performed at baseline, following each intervention block and 6-months post-intervention included: Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT-FAS, Primary Outcome), upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, Ashworth Scale, and Functional Independence Measure. Neuromechanical function was evaluated using isometric and dynamic joint torques and concurrent agonist EMG. Biceps stretch reflex responses were evaluated using passive elbow stretches ranging from 60 to 180º/s and determining: EMG onset position threshold, burst duration, burst intensity and passive torque at each speed.
resultsPRIMARY OUTCOME: Improvements in WMFT-FAS were significantly greater following HYBRID vs. FTP (p = .049), regardless of treatment order. These functional improvements were retained 6-months post-intervention (p = .03). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: A greater proportion of participants achieved minimally important differences (MID) following HYBRID vs. FTP (p = .03). MIDs were retained 6-months post-intervention. Ashworth scores were unchanged (p > .05). Increased maximal isometric joint torque, agonist EMG and peak power were significantly greater following HYBRID vs. FTP (p < .05) and effects were retained 6-months post-intervention (p's < .05). EMG position threshold and burst duration were significantly reduced at fast speeds (≥120º/s) (p's < 0.05) and passive torque was reduced post-washout (p < .05) following HYBRID.
conclusionsFunctional and neuromechanical gains were greater following HYBRID vs. FPT. Improved stretch reflex modulation and increased neuromuscular activation indicate potent neural adaptations. Importantly, no deleterious consequences, including exacerbation of spasticity or musculoskeletal complaints, were associated with HYBRID. These results contribute to an evolving body of contemporary evidence regarding the efficacy of high-intensity training in neurorehabilitation and the physiological mechanisms that mediate neural recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.