Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23336557›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2013

Technique of endoscopic biopsy of islet allografts transplanted into the gastric submucosal space in pigs.

Minoru Fujita, Kevin M McGrath, Rita Bottino, Eefje M Dons, Cassandra Long, Goutham Kumar, Burcin Ekser, Gabriel J Echeverri, Jiro Hata, Ken Haruma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contributions of Europeans to Xenotransplantation Research: 2. Pig Islet and Cell Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Minoru FujitaThomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kevin M McGrath
Rita Bottino
Eefje M Dons
Cassandra Long
Goutham Kumar
Burcin Ekser
Gabriel J Echeverri
Jiro Hata
Ken Haruma
David K C Cooper
Hidetaka Hara

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Interdisciplinary Training in Transplantation BiologyT32AI074490 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Angus W Thomson · 2007 to 2026
$4.2M
ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY OF ISLET TRANSPLANTS IN THE GASTRIC SUBMUCOSAL SPACE IN PIGSR03AI096296 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARA, HIDETAKA · 2011 to 2012
$152k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI096296NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, islet cells are transplanted into the liver via portal vein infusion. One disadvantage of this approach is that it is not possible to adequately biopsy the islets in the liver to assess for rejection. Islet transplantation (Tx) into the gastric submucosal space (GSMS) can be performed endoscopically and has the potential advantage of histological evaluation by endoscopic biopsy. The aim of this study was to determine whether a representative allograft sample could be obtained endoscopically. We performed islet Tx into the GSMS in nonimmunosuppressed pigs using simple endoscopic submucosal injection. Islets were transplanted at four sites. Endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy of the transplanted islets at two sites by modified endoscopic submucosal dissection were carried out successfully in all pigs 5 days after islet Tx. Tissue obtained at both biopsy and necropsy (including full-thickness sections of the gastric wall around the sites of the remaining islets and biopsies) were examined by histology and immunohistochemistry to confirm the presence of the islet grafts and any features of rejection. Representative allograft sampling was successfully obtained from all biopsy sites. All biopsies included islets with insulin-positive staining. There was significant CD3(+) and CD68(+) cell infiltration in the islet masses obtained at biopsy and from sections taken at necropsy, with similar histopathological features. Endoscopic biopsy of islet allografts in the GSMS is feasible, provides accurate histopathological data, and would provide a significant advance if translated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Islets of Langerhans TransplantationAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD3 ComplexCD68 MoleculeEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEndosonographyFemaleGastric MucosaGraft SurvivalIslets of LangerhansNecrosisSwineTransplantation, HomologousAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD3 ComplexCD68 antigen, humanCD68 Molecule

Identifiers

PMID23336557
PMCPMC3869889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.