Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23336456›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2013

Dismantling Lord Moran's ladder: the primary care expert generalist.

Joanne Reeve, Greg Irving, George Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Generalism as a cross-disciplinary practice in medicine: Mixed-studies systematic review.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  6. Defining theCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The expert medical generalist.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  9. Genomics in general practice: Generation Genome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  10. Not 'just' a GP: a call for action.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  11. Supporting expert generalist practice: the SAGE consultation model.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Generalism: the princess and the pea.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. First do no harm: education deals with the application of general principles in uncertain situations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanne ReeveDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK. joanne.reeve@liv.ac.uk
Greg Irving
George Freeman

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2010-03-66Department of Health NIHR/CS/009/013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersPrimary Health CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMalePhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID23336456
PMCPMC3529267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.