Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23336066›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2013

A sclerite-bearing stem group entoproct from the early Cambrian and its implications.

Zhifei Zhang, Lars E Holmer, Christian B Skovsted, Glenn A Brock, Graham E Budd, Dongjing Fu, Xingliang Zhang, Degan Shu, Jian Han, Jianni Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molluscan Shells, Spicules, and Gladii Are Evolutionarily Deeply Conserved.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ecological innovations in the Cambrian and the origins of the crown group phyla.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  10. Ediacaran skeletal metazoan interpreted as a lophophorate.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhifei ZhangEarly Life Institute, State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an, China. elizf@nwu.edu.cn
Lars E Holmer
Christian B Skovsted
Glenn A Brock
Graham E Budd
Dongjing Fu
Xingliang Zhang
Degan Shu
Jian Han
Jianni Liu
Haizhou Wang
Aodhán Butler
Guoxiang Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Lophotrochozoa includes disparate tentacle-bearing sessile protostome animals, which apparently appeared in the Cambrian explosion, but lack an uncontested fossil record. Here we describe abundant well preserved material of Cotyledion tylodes Luo et Hu, 1999, from the Cambrian (Series 2) Chengjiang deposits, reinterpreted here as a stem-group entoproct. The entoproct affinity is supported by the sessile body plan and interior soft anatomy. The body consists of an upper calyx and a lower elongate stalk with a distal holdfast. The soft anatomy includes a U-shaped gut with a mouth and aboral anus ringed by retractable marginal tentacles. Cotyledion differs from extant entoprocts in being larger, and having the calyx and the stalk covered by numerous loosely-spaced external sclerites. The description of entoprocts from the Chengjiang biota traces the ancestry of yet another lophotrochozoan phylum back to the Cambrian radiation, and has important implications for the earliest evolution of lophotrochozoans.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFossilsAnimalsInvertebratesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23336066
PMCPMC3548229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.