Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23335795›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2013

Effect of stellate ganglia stimulation on global and regional left ventricular function as assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography.

Wei Zhou, Kentaro Yamakawa, Peyman Benharash, Olujimi Ajijola, Daniel Ennis, Joseph Hadaya, Marmar Vaseghi, Kalyanam Shivkumar, Aman Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Central vs. peripheral neuraxial sympathetic control of porcine ventricular electrophysiology.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Kentaro Yamakawa
Peyman Benharash
Olujimi Ajijola
Daniel Ennis
Joseph Hadaya
Marmar Vaseghi
Kalyanam Shivkumar
Aman Mahajan

Funding

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF NEURAL REMODELING OF THE VENTRICLESR01HL084261 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHIVKUMAR, KALYANAM · 2006 to 2016
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL-084261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) twist mechanics and regional strain during cardiac sympathetic efferent activation are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of left stellate ganglia (LSG) and right stellate ganglia (RSG) stimulation on cardiac twist/untiwst mechanics and regional strain. In nine pigs, echocardiographic imaging and LV pressure-volume measurements were performed before and during unilateral and bilateral stellate ganglion stimulation. LSG and RSG stimulation significantly augmented LV end-systolic pressure by 24% and 22% (P < 0.01), maximal rate of LV pressure change by 167% and 165% (P < 0.01), and time constant of LV relaxation by 20% and 12% (P < 0.01), respectively. RSG stimulation resulted in a greater chronotropic response than LSG stimulation (RSG: 68% vs. LSG: 12%, P < 0.01). Both LSG and RSG stimulation significantly increased global epicardial and endocardial LV rotation and diastolic untwisting rate and reduced the time to peak rotation (P < 0.05). However, LSG stimulation predominantly increased radial and circumferential strain in the LV inferoseptal, inferior, posterior, and lateral regions, whereas RSG stimulation primarily increased radial and circumferential strain in the anteroseptal, anterior, and lateral LV regions. Stimulation of both stellate ganglia led to a uniform increase in all LV segments. Our data suggest that LSG and RSG stimulation lead to a global increase in LV twist, driven by distinct regional strain heterogeneity that may result from myocardial innervation from the LSG and RSG. These findings provide a better understanding of the global and regional functional consequences of regional myocardial innervation from the LSG and RSG.

Indexed as

Ventricular Function, LeftAnimalsBlood PressureEchocardiographyElectric StimulationEndocardiumFemaleHeart RateHeart VentriclesMyocardial ContractionPericardiumRotationStellate GanglionSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID23335795
PMCPMC3602776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.