Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23335764›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2013

Inactivation of pathogens in feces by desiccation and urea treatment for application in urine-diverting dry toilets.

Maria Elisa Magri, Luiz Sérgio Philippi, Björn Vinnerås

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Enterobacteria Survival, Percolation, and Leaching on Soil Fertilized with Swine Manure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Inactivation of pathogens in ecological sanitation latrines in Malawi: An observational follow up study.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2019
    Observational
  12. Review of global sanitation development.Environment international · 2018
    Review
  13. Fate of Fecal Indicators in Resource-Oriented Sanitation Systems Using Nitrifying Bio-Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Management of sewage sludge by composting using fermented water hyacinth.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Elisa MagriDepartment of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. mmagri@ens.ufsc.br
Luiz Sérgio Philippi
Björn Vinnerås

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological sanitation technologies can be effective in providing health and environmental pollution control if they can efficiently reduce the pathogenicity of microorganisms carried in fecal material to safe levels. This study evaluated the sanitizing effects of different additives for dry treatment of feces from urine-diverting dry toilets, based on inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX, and Ascaris suum. The additives, ash (A) and oyster shell (O) in different amounts and urea (U) to optimize the process, were compared with no additive, solely urea, and sawdust as controls (C) and were covered ([x%O:A]) or uncovered (x%O:A). The main inactivation factors found were desiccation, ammonia content, and pH. S. Typhimurium and E. faecalis were more affected by the ammonia content. A combination of neutral to high pH and desiccation was most effective for inactivation of MS2, and desiccation was most effective for inactivation of ΦX and A. suum. The inactivation rate was modeled for all combinations studied. The most promising treatments were [150%O:A+U], 150%O:A+U, and 150%O:A. According to the models, these could inactivate, for example, 7 log(10) units of all bacteria and bacteriophages within 83, 125, and 183 days, respectively. The inactivation of A. suum was modeled, albeit the measured decay in egg viability was low.

Indexed as

DesiccationCell SurvivalDisinfectantsFecesMicrobial ViabilitySanitationUreaDisinfectantsUrea

Identifiers

PMID23335764
PMCPMC3623211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.